Hawaiian Libertarian
« Previous EntriesArticle Summary
- Undeclared & Unconstitutional Wars [2010-Mar-10]
- The Hidden Picture Within the Picture [2010-Mar-8]
- The Vajazzle Monologues [2010-Mar-5]
- The Anti-Suffragists Knew Exactly What Would Happen… [2010-Mar-4]
- Hope for the Best While Preparing for the Worst [2010-Mar-2]
- Red-pill Reflections On Blue-pill Delusions [2010-Feb-25]
- Our Dysfunctional Society was Deliberately Designed That Way [2010-Feb-11]
- The Married Man’s Last Stand [2010-Feb-8]
- The System Was Designed to Make Us Go Mad [2010-Feb-1]
- Expanding the Taxonomy of Male Classifications [2010-Jan-29]
- « Previous Articles
Undeclared & Unconstitutional Wars
Wednesday, March 10th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
So I'm in the midst of reading None Dare Call It Conspiracy, the aforementioned book in my last post, and I've come across something in Chapter 6: The Rockefellers and the Reds, that suddenly clicked a missing puzzle piece into place in my own mind.
One of the things I used to struggle with as a pro-War, Dubya voting RepubliNeo-Con, was the fact that even though I used to think the Iraq war was necessary, justified and righteous...I was always puzzled by Bush and the GOP refusing to put forth a motion on the floor of Congress to ask for an official declaration of war, as required by the US Constitution.
Of course, in hindsight, the fact that Dubya didn't bother to adhere to the Constitution is certainly not a big surprise, only now do I finally see the hidden picture within the picture, regarding the reason why our country has engaged in a number of military actions without that Constitutionally mandated declaration by congress: to declare war officially, would mean any American corporations or firms selling arms, and goods that can be used for military purposes, would have to immediately cease doing business with an officially declared enemy or be considered treasonous and subject to the harshest penalties under the law.
Is it starting to make a little more sense now?
From pp. 68-69 of None Dare Call It A Conspiracy (note that this book was published in 1971 - the Vietnam War was still ongoing, hence the present tense references):
On October 7, 1966, President Lyndon Johnson, a man who had appointed a C.F.R. {Council on Foreign Relations} member to virtually every strategic position in his administration, stated:"We intend to press for legislative authority to negotiate trade agreements which could extend most favored-nation tariff treatment to European Communist states. We will reduce export controls on East-West trade with respect to hundreds of on strategic items…"
The New York Times reported one week later on October 13, 1966:"The United States put into effect today one of President Johnson's proposals for stimulating East-West trade by removing restrictions on the export of more than four hundred commodities to the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe…Among the categories from which items have been selected for export relaxation are vegetables, cereals, fodder, hides, crude and manufactured rubber, pulp and waste paper, textiles and textile fibers, crude fertilizers, metal ores and scrap, petroleum, gas and derivatives, chemical compounds and products, dyes, medicines, fireworks, detergents, plastic materials, metal products and machinery, and scientific and professional instruments."
Virtually every one of these "non-strategic" items has a direct or indirect use in war.
Later, items such as rifle cleaning compounds, electronic equipment and radar were declared "non-strategic" and cleared for shipment to the Soviet Union. The trick simply is to declare almost everything "non-strategic." A machine gun is still considered strategic and therefore may not be shipped to the Communists, but the tools for making the machine guns and the chemicals to propel the bullets have been declared "non-strategic."
Meanwhile, nearly 50,000 Americans have died in Vietnam. The Viet Cong and North Vietnamese receive 85 percent of their war materials from Russia and the Soviet bloc nations. Since their economies are incapable of supporting a war, the Communist arm of the conspiracy needed help from the Finance Capitalist arm. The United States has been financing and equipping both sides of the terrible Vietnamese war, killing our own soldiers by proxy. Again, the landscape painters in the mass media have kept the American public from learning this provable fact.
Not surprisingly, the Rockefellers have been leaders in championing this bloody trade. On January 16, 1967, one of the most incredible articles ever to appear in a newspaper graced the front page of the Establishment's daily, the New York Times. Under the headline "Eaton Joins Rockefellers To Spur Trade With Reds" the article stated: "An alliance of family fortunes linking Wall Street and the Midwest is going to try to build economic bridges between the free world and Communist Europe. The International Basic Economy Corporation, controlled by the Rockefeller brothers, and Tower International, Inc., headed by Cyrus S. Eaton Jr., Cleveland financier, plan to cooperate in promoting trade between the Iron Curtain countries, including the Soviet Union…"
International Basic Economy Corporation (IBEC) is run by Richard Aldrich, grandson of Federal Reserve plotter Nelson Aldrich, and Rodman Rockefeller• (CFR), Rocky 5 son.
On October 20, 1969, IBEC announced that N M Rothschild & Sons of London had entered into partner ship with the firm.
Cyrus Eaton Jr. is the son of the notoriously pro Soviet Cyrus Eaton, who began his
career as secretary to John D. Rockefeller. It is believed that Eaton's rise to power in finance resulted from backing by his mentor. The agreement between Tower International and IBEC continues an old alliance. Although Eaton's name does not appear on the CFR's membership rolls, the Reece Committee which investigated foundations for Congress in 1953, found that Eaton was a secret member.
Among the "non-strategic" items which the Rockefeller Eaton axis is going to build for the Communists are ten rubber goods plants, including two synthetic rubber plants worth $200 million. Mr. Eaton explains in the Times article: "These people are setting up new automobile plants and know they have got to have tire factories." Under the Nixon Administration which, contrary to campaign promises, has multiplied trade with the Reds tenfold, American concerns are building the world's largest truck factory for the Communists. Trucks are necessary for a nation's war machine and truck factories can be converted to the production of tanks as was done during WWII.
The U. S. will provide the Soviets with both the facilities to build the trucks and the tires (or tank treads) for them to roll on.
In addition, the Rockefellers and Eatons are constructing a $50 million aluminum producing plant for the Reds Aluminum for jet planes is considered "non-strategic under Johnson-Nixon doctrine.
See how this works? Like the venerable USMC General Smedley Butler wrote, War is a Racket.
The US has been involved in 6 official "military engagements" since the last official declaration of War as required by the Constitution...or, as Wikipedia calls them: "Authorized by Congress."
What a neat little trick! So now our American based, military-industrial complex need not worry about "treason" while selling military wares to both the US taxpayer as well as the governments of those countries our congress has "authorized" our military to "engage!"
As a caption from a picture from None Dare Call It A Conspiracy points out:
The Rockefeller and Eaton families have now joined forces to build war production plants behind the Iron Curtain so that the Communists can become a bigger threat to U. S. survival. America spends $70 billion a year ostensibly on defense and then the Rockefellers build aluminum mills for the Communists. Only the absence of a formal declaration of war in Vietnam keeps the Eatons and Rockefellers from being actionable for treason. They have the blood of nearly 50,000 American servicemen on their hands.
Ahh, it's all so clear now.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
The Hidden Picture Within the Picture
Monday, March 8th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for us which deliberately hide the real picture. - Gary Allen & Larry Abraham
In a moment of circumspection while commuting amongst the rat race of a typical morning Hawaiian-style traffic jam, I attempted to assess the length and breadth of the intellectual journey I've undertaken in these last few years. What began as a curious search on the internet in trying to find an explanation for the seemingly illegal and unjust way in which my Uncle's ex-wife utterly screwed him over in divorce court, has turned into a complete re-orientation of my point of view of this world and my way of life in it.
This great unraveling of the lies, misinformation, propaganda and indoctrination that had been constructed in my mind by the various influences of institutional and cultural shaping is almost overwhelming when I try to grasp the sheer magnitude of what has been done to we, the peoples of the 21st Century.
The most difficult thing to do when it comes to "unplugging" from the matrix of our BraveNewWorldOrder has been avoiding becoming the 'crazy' guy trying to warn everyone else. It's one thing to discuss these things in the relative comfort of internet anonymity...quite another discussing such things with people in real life.
I've learned to simply avoid direct confrontation with people. Rather, I try to take a subtle, Devil's advocate approach to undermining deceptions and lies whenever I encounter them in real life. This usually means contradicting the conventional wisdom that encompasses dietary guidelines, the grand charade of dialectical political theater, mass media indoctrination, and of course, gender roles.
Often times, it feels rather discouraging when you can actually get someone to agree with you on one of these topics, or another...but the minute you try to share your insight the grand, overarching movement to tie it all together, well THAT'S when you become the crazy guy donning the tinfoil hat and hiding from the black helicopters. The proliferation of dis- and mis- information is so ubiquitous, that I think it's easy for people to simply shut down their critical thinking capacity as soon as their "fantastic theory" meter hits overload.
So I've come to the point where I wanted to find more corroboration to the views I've already formulated in my mind. What sources exist out there for which I could point people towards so they can ascertain themselves whether or not "conspiracy theory" is based on reality or insanity? In seeking such sources, I've come across three books that have recently become available as free pdf downloads...three books that were all written decades ago, yet who's content is as timely as ever.
In terms of the Masculine-focused blogosphere, many people have gone to great lengths to reveal the ties between the feminist movement and it's ties to communism. The evidence making this connection is rather overwhelming and quite easy to establish. Most MRA bloggers and commentariat are familiar with these arguments.
But it doesn't end there. Who was really behind the Communist movement? How where they able to effect this long march through Western culture? This is what initially led me to the New World Order conspiracy theory sphere of the internet.
If you dig deep enough into the roots of feminism in the West, you will find that the connections between the Rockefeller Foundation is THE money behind all of the grants, studies, legislative movements, political campaigns with regards to feminism, population control and abortion, as well as the entire Women's Studies college curriculum that is now established on 98% of the Western World's Academic institutions.As Henry Makow pointed out: If you search "Rockefeller Foundation" and "Women's Studies" in Google, you will get over 19000 entries.
Just who or what exactly is the Rockefeller Foundation? Wonder no more...I've just discovered a free, online version of The Rockefeller Files. Keep in mind that this book was published back in 1975, when you consider this quote from Chapter Ten, The People Planners. Consider how many aspects of this "vision" have already come to pass:
In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands."Now, thanks to the taxpayers, the Rockefellers have almost limitless funds. As a result, faceless bureaucrats in Washington whom you did not hire and whom you cannot fire - now tell you how to run your business, whom you may hire, where your children will be bussed to school, what products you can purchase, and even what foods you can and cannot eat. It is only a matter of time until the dictocrats tell you how many children you are permitted to have. - Fred Gates, aide to John D. Rockefeller
Now, when you research the Rockefellers and their vision of a New World Order, you will invariably come up with another institution that the Rockefeller's founded: The Council of Foreign Relations.
From Obama & The CFR:
Established in the 1920's and headquartered in New York, its membership includes prominent politicians and business elite, including heads of academia and media. The organization seeks to centralize both political power and market power to craft legislation outside the checks and balances of democracy. The CFR is rarely mentioned by the mainstream media, making it difficult to fully gauge its influence. When it is mentioned in the press, it is likely whitewashed as trivial or irrelevant. Notable members of the CFR include: John Rockefeller, David Rockefeller, Nelson Rockefeller, Dick Cheney, John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Condolezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Alan Greenspan, Colin Powell, Henry Kissinger & Angelina Jolie (Yes, the actress has a five year term membership as an ambassador).
Its membership list is a who's who of Washington and Wall St. elite going back nearly a
century. It should not be surprising that most presidential candidates in the 2008 election are CFR members. Candidates do not advertise their CFR membership to the public. They pose as
“liberals” and “conservatives” to control all aspects of the debate. The CFR has stacked the deck for the 2008 election with several members in the race from both sides of the isle:
Democrat CFR Candidates: Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Chris Dodd & Bill Richardson
Republican CFR Candidates: Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, Fred Thompson, & Newt Gingrich.
The mainstream media's self-proclaimed “top tier” candidates are united in their CFR membership, while an unwitting public perceives political diversity. The unwitting public has been conditioned to instinctively deny such a mass deception could ever be hidden in plain view. Presidential Candidate & Congressman Ron Paul is the only “top tier” candidate who is not a member of the CFR.
When people are informed of the CFR and how most Republican and Democrat politicians on the National Stage are members of it, they often ignore it...like the CFR is some meaningless politician's club or debating society. But consider the words of a CFR insider, Carroll Quigley:
The goals of the CFR is best described by its very own members. Bill Clinton's Georgetown mentor and CFR member Carroll Quigley states: “The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one world rule established.”. Quigley differs from many of his CFR colleagues in that he believes their plan for a new world order should be more publicly disclosed. In his book Tragedy and Hope, Quigley concedes he is unique among his peers in that he believes the new world order plan of global government's “role in history is significant enough to be known”. Quigley also admits that the two-party system allows for both groups to be controlled at the highest level but operate like bitter rivals. As Quigley says, this gives the voters the chance to “throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound of extreme shifts in policy.”. Controlling Washington elite allowed private central banks to “dominate the political system... ...and economy of world as a whole” and implement a new system of “feudalist fashion” through “secret agreements”. Although he believes the CFR's intentions should be more public, Quigley understands the average person doesn't understand feudalism or serfdom and will never read his book.
Quigley himself also authored a book entitled Tragedy and Hope, an extensive history interspersed with startling information about the secret organizations behind the impact on almost every major event of modern history. (Note: the link goes to a 1090 paged pdf document. It may take awhile to download it in it's entirety.)Quigley's tome has often been cited for it's candid admissions of the elite power structure intent on implementing their New World Order, but today is the first time I was able to find a complete, free pdf file of the book online.
The final book, another that I have just discovered a free pdf file of online, is one I have yet to read...but have heard a lot about: None Dare Call It a ConspiracyThe first paragraph of the book (which also contains the opening quote for this post) has already got me intrigued...
Most of us have had the experience, either as parents or youngsters, of trying to discover the "hidden picture' within another picture in a children's magazine. Usually you are shown a landscape with trees, bushes, flowers and other bits of nature. The caption reads something like this: "Concealed somewhere in this picture is a donkey pulling a cart with a boy in it. Can you find them?" Try as you might, usually you could not find the hidden picture until you turned to a page farther back in the magazine which would reveal how cleverly the artist had hidden it from us. If we study the landscape we realize that the whole picture was painted in such a way as to conceal the real picture within, and once we see the "real picture," it stands out like the proverbial painful digit.
We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for us which deliberately hide the real picture. In this book we will show you how to discover the "hidden picture" in the landscapes presented to us daily through newspapers, radio and. television. Once you can see through the camouflage, you will see the donkey, the cart and the boy who have been there all along.
Though I've just begun reading, I believe I can already see this picture that has been there all along.
Perhaps you too will read these books and see the hidden pictures for yourself.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
The Vajazzle Monologues
Friday, March 5th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
Apparently Ferdinand Bardamu is attempting to put together his own little play, The Vajazzle Monologues, to compete with Eve Ensler's notorious V-Day production! Since he's given me so much link love in the past for both this blog and my posts over at The Spearhead, I've decided to give his efforts a free plug.
Here are some scenes that will be presented, to highlight how women have finally overcome years of oppression and inequality by reclaiming their private parts through the liberating practice of applying cheap sparkly pasties with a TV infomercial glue gun , to bling their vaginas!
* I Was Twelve, My Mother Vajazzled Me: a chorus describing many young women's and girls' first experiences shared with their mothers upon decorating their genitalia for the very first time.
* My Sparkling Vagina, in which a woman humorously rants about the lack of variation amongst the jewel stones available for vajazzling to strike a blow at the hetero-normative hegemony of Patriarchy!
* My Vagina Was My Disco Ball, a dialogue between George Lopez and the Hollywood Starlet Jennifer Love Hewitt, that brought this awesome practice into the public consciousness for the first time.
* The Little Coochie Sparkler That Could, in which a woman recalls memories of traumatic sexual experiences in her childhood with her plain, undecorated vajayjay and a self-described "positive healing" sexual experience in her adolescent years with an older woman who vajazzled her little coochie with some bling. In the original version, she is 13, but later versions would change her age to 16. This particular skit has sparked numerous controversies and criticisms due to this age discrepancies. Women are still trying to determine what is the appropriate age to validate their equality by vajazzleing their vajayjays.
* Reclaiming Cunt, a piece narrated by a woman who illustrates that the word "cunt" itself is a lovely word when used to reference all those brave women that have undergone vajazzlefication!
* The Woman Who Loved to Make Vaginas Sparkle, in which a prostitute for women discusses the intriguing details of her career and her love of giving women vajayjay bling. In several performances it often comes at the end of the play, literally climaxing with an actual demonstration of a virgin vajayjay being vajazzled.
* Because He Liked to Look At It, in which a woman describes how she had thought her pubic area was ugly and had been embarrassed to even think about it, but changed her mind after she vajazzled her vajayjay and than had a drunken one-night stand with a pickup artist named Bob who spent hours entranced by her vagina bling.
* I Was There In The Room, a monologue in which Ferdinand describes the birth of his vajazzle campaign.
Coming to all Womyn's Studies Programs at your local Universities and community colleges soon!
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
The Anti-Suffragists Knew Exactly What Would Happen…
Thursday, March 4th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
One of the first red pills I had initial resistance to swallowing as I was going through my initial eye-opening phase of attaining insight into the reality of our BraveNewWorldOrder, was the idea that Woman's Suffrage was a bad thing.
I think I first encountered the anti-suffragist point of view reading Vox Day, back when I was an elephant kool aid drunkard around 2002 or so. I was literally shocked when I first read VD's reasons for opposing suffrage. I couldn't believe anyone thought like that. Little did I know back then just how deep down that rabbit hole I would eventually go....
Of course, when you are firmly plugged into our mainstream media matrix and sufficiently re-educated and dumbed down by public schooling indoctrination camps, you simply "know" that "Brave Suffragists fought heroically in the early 20th century to secure the right to vote for women!" THE RIGHT TO VOTE, we are told, is one of the highest duties; a responsibility and an exercise in civic responsibility...doing an act that supposedly made this country great.
As we know, the winners of the war always write the history in their favor...and the suffragists certainly won this war.
The funny thing is that up until recently, I had always assumed that the suffragist activists that pushed to get the 19th amendment passed had pulled a fast one over an unsuspecting country. Thanks to my recent discovery of an excellent blog, Full of Grace, Seasoned with Salt, I found the evidence that the anti-suffragist movement knew exactly who the suffragists were and what they were trying to accomplish. Indeed, everything they predicted has come to pass.
The author of Full of Grace, "Laura" has a series of posts that were the result of her research of old newspaper micro-fiche files available online. You will find it well worth your time to specifically read all of her posts labeled with the following icon:
Well done Laura!One of the items of interest she posted was a flyer printed up by the anti-suffragists opposed to the "Susan B. Anthony" amendment to the constitution. Have a look at the arguments they put forth:
The more a politician allows himself to be henpecked, the more henpecking we will have in politics.
American pep which was the result of a masculine dominated country will soon be a thing of the past. With the collapse of male ascendancy in this country we can look forward to a nation of degeneration. The suppression of sex will ultimately have its harvest in decadence, a phenomenon already beginning. The effect of the social revolution on American character will be to make "sissies" of American men--a process already well under way". --Dr. William J. Hickson, Chicago University.
WOMAN SUFFRAGE denature both men and women; it masculinizes women and feminizes men. The history of ancient civilization has proven that a weakening of the man power of nations has been but a pre-runner of decadence in civilization.
They were not merely trying to scare up opposition to the suffragists, touting some mythical, worst case scenario that might have come to pass. No, these were people who understood their history and the way that gender roles and the social norms of a culture that support them will either build up or tear down "civilization."
As Laura wrote in her post, Henpecked America: Organized Female Nagging Forever -
"What else is there to say? I think this and the other articles make it very clear the purpose of feminism. Back in the day those who believed it would destroy men and the family were probably seen as crazy. But, here we are now living the the proof."
Not just back in those days, my dear. If you were to tell a typical, modern day American woman (or man for that matter) that the suffrage movement was a disguised, subversive attack on the family and deliberately employed to break up families and foster discord between men and women, so that politicians would than be able to grab power by playing off of women's fears and basic instinctual desire to prefer security over freedom, she would look at you like you're an escapee from the loony bin.
I love the cartoon at the top of this anti-suffragist flyer, as it perfectly encapsulates the consequences of the politicization of the female gender. Note the broken egg with the dead chick on the bottom right corner of the nest. This was 50 years before Roe v. Wade became the law of the land and millions of women have slaughtered the babes in their wombs in the name of "choice."
Oh yes, the anti-suffragists of that era knew exactly who they were dealing with.
As I noted in my first contribution to the Spearhead, the Women's suffrage movement as portrayed by feminist revisionist history, was based on the idea that women were "denied" the vote by oppressive, misogynist men, but the reality had nothing to do with "oppression." The real reason was based on the way in which society viewed the institution of marriage back then.
The most important thing to consider first, was the widely held belief system that was accepted by society at large in the bad old days of Patriarchal oppression…primarily with regards to marriage. Before the sexual revolution and cultural upheaval of the 1960’s, America was widely understood to be a Christian nation. Most Americans were church going citizens and the moral code of the Bible and it’s 10 commandments and the New Testament’s “golden rule” were the accepted ’social contract’ of moral principles.
Why is this relevant? Because the basic principle of a Christian-based society like the early America was the idea that marriage was the merging of a man and woman into a single entity. One unit. In the physical, spiritual and legal sense of the word.
Signer of the Declaration of Independence and also one of the framers of the Constitution, James Wilson, wrote about how Marriage was considered under the eyes of the law:The most important consequence of marriage is, that the husband and the wife become, in law, only one person: the legal existence of the wife is consolidated into that of the husband. Upon this principle of union, almost all the other legal consequences of marriage depend.
This was the true essence of the reasoning why women were never specifically designated as a separate, legal entity, apart from her husband in manners concerning society. In other words, the prevailing cultural attitude of the times was that in terms of civic duties, the vote was designated as one vote per family…one vote per household…or one vote per single entity – that single entity being a married couple.
And in the past, the vast majority of women did get married. Only a few women in any given community became “old maids” and spinsters. It was simply the cultural norm for women to get married and have children. Therefore, one vote, one household (provided the man of the house owned property).
Women need the vote like a Hen needs a bicycle.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
Hope for the Best While Preparing for the Worst
Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
Within the last 5 years, I've experienced two events here in Hawaii that show how dependent most people have become to our modern, technology driven way of life....and how our modern Society is ill prepared to deal with the basic necessities of life following potentially catastrophic events. The first event was an undersea earthquake near the Big Island in October of 2005. It shook the entire Island chain on an early Sunday morning.
10 minutes after the quake, the power generators at the Oahu power plants shut down as an automatic safety precaution, as the quake caused the massive turbines to shift while they were in operation. This cut off power across the entire island. Completely. All traffic lights, street lights...everything was without power.
Within minutes, the local grocery stores were inundated with the masses of people, quickly buying up as much food, ice, charcoal, bottled water and toilet paper as they could. Most stores sold out within several hours. It took the Hawaiian Electric Co. about 12 hours to restore the power.
But I never forgot having to stand in a line at my community grocery store that day, that rivaled an amusement park roller coaster ride in the middle of the summer jam, to get into the grocery store. There was no lights, and the generator roaring out back was used only to keep the freezers and refrigerators powered up so the food wouldn't spoil. The store employees were only escorting two people at a time with flashlights, and were hand-writing all sales transactions and only accepting cash.
It was quite the experience to walk around a darkened store by flashlight and seeing all the shelves that had been rapidly emptied by panicked people.
That experience inspired me to make my own storehouse of provisions and supplies. I never again wanted to have to stand in a long line of unprepared people, desperate to get the chance to try and buy up a dwindling supply of provisions while worrying about a pending catastrophic event.
The scene repeated itself this past weekend. The Tsunami warning Hawaii was under following the Chilean earthquake this past Friday once again resulted in a mad scramble of the masses.
I saw the news alerts on Friday night after turning on the Tell-a-Vision during a midnight snack.
Our local news channels immediately began instructing the viewers to run out to the store and stock up on canned food, water, charcoal, ice, toilet paper and to top off all of their cars gasoline tanks. They also advised that the State Civil Defense Agency would be sounding the warning sirens at 6am that morning.
Since the Tsunami was predicted to hit our shores around 11:30am, this gave roughly 5 hours for everyone living near the coastlines of our island state to load up their valuables and camping gear and head for higher ground.
So of course, by 6:30am, the cars were lined up for 3-4 blocks to fill up their cars with gas, the stores quickly sold out of staple groceries, and all the roads from coastal areas leading to higher ground became a bumper to bumper traffic jam. Everyone went into a hoarding and evacuation frenzy.
I, on the other hand, relaxed comfortably in my yard, enjoying some refreshing beverages and observing the Ocean with binoculars, waiting to see if the telltale signs of a pending Tsunami would manifest. I was particularly interested to see if the water would suck out to sea, exposing the reefs and ocean floor before the Tsunami surge rolled in. Previous Tsunami's in Hawaii's history relate many eyewitness accounts to this phenomenon just before the Tsunami surge arrives on shore.
Needless to say, my afternoon of leisurely waiting for the Tsunami to arrive ended up being a weird mixture of relief and disappointment. I'm glad it wasn't a disaster that destroyed a lot of people's property...but I was somewhat excited to witness a rare event from a comfortable, and well-prepared vantage point.
The reason why I did not have to panic, run out to the store and compete with the urgent masses trying to hoard as much of life's necessities as possible, is because I've already got my own stock of provisions, fuel and water...as well as ammunition.
I've also got my own thriving fruit vegetable and herb garden, livestock and egg-laying chickens. I'm fairly confident that I could literally survive without a grocery store, electricity and gasoline for an indefinite amount of time.
While I may have dropped out as a troubled teenager from my local Boy Scout troop long before attaining the rank of Eagle...I did attend long enough to absorb and incorporate the Boy Scout motto as a primary tenet of my personal ethos - Be Prepared.
Are you prepared for the potential breakdown of civil society, and a mad scramble for provisions and resources for the masses of Sheeple who never gave it a moments thought until the civil defense sirens began to wail? Are you able and capable AND have the means to defend your life, your family and your property?
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
Red-pill Reflections On Blue-pill Delusions
Thursday, February 25th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
As the old saying goes, hindsight is always 20/20...and after a bit of rumination and introspection, I think this axiom is certainly true. Inspired by the blogging of Alkibiades and Talleyrand and their frequent posts over at Seasons of Tumult and Discord regarding their "red-pill" based observations of interpersonal relationship dynamics in their day-to-day interactions, as well as recalling their experiences from their pasts, I too began to think a lot about my own experiences and of those of the people I've known.
Looking back to my own relationships, and those of relationships of friends and family for which I have an intimate knowledge of their particular dynamics, I now realize that I have a much clearer understanding of why people ended up doing the things they did; why they took certain tracks in life.
When I was a young man in my 20's, I self-identified as a socially-libertine conservative Republican - i.e. basically a small government, anti-liberal - Rush Limbaugh listening - FOXNews watching - Republican voting - pot smoker. I always supported the Libertarian Party platform and candidates...but I used to buy into the lie that I HAD to vote Republican to fight the liberal - socialist Democrats. (8 years of the Dubya-led GOP and his "compassionate conservatism" certainly cured me of that particular notion.)
Nevertheless, one of the ideas I used to accept without reservation was the idea that the two parent family was inviolable - that screwed up people only came from broken households with absentee parental guidance or abusive step-parents...which is of course the right-wing view as promoted by the likes of Rush and Bill O'Reilly et al. So I was always puzzled whenever I thought about a particular family that I knew of. The Father was a retired military man, the mother, an Asian he married while deployed overseas. They married, and moved to Hawaii, and had two children, a girl and a boy. They were both in my peer group and we all hung out amongst the same clique in High School and the first half of my 20's.
The girl was known as 'easy.' Not exactly considered a slut...but she was the penultimate serial monogamy-polyandrist. She dated almost every single guy amongst our social peer group. While she wouldn't have one night stands or cheat on a current boyfriend, it was widely known that all you had to do was ask her out and take her on a single date and you would be getting some until either she broke up with you or you broke it off with her. In a 10 year period (from 15-25 I lost contact with them after that - but eventually connected with her again through facebook.), I would say she "dated" probably 35+ guys. I would say it's not too outrageous to guess the pattern continued in the last decade since I last saw her. The reason why I write about her story is because she dated 3 of my closest friends for extended periods of time (3-6 months...for her, that was extensive.) I saw first hand the relationship arc she went through with each of my friends. Of course I had no understanding at all about the dynamics that played out at the time.
Her younger brother was a definite wild-child, who constantly got into trouble, and eventually dropped out of school. He and I used to hang out occasionally, and would often deal with each other in terms of acquiring our favored smokable herbs. I've spent a bit of time at their house just hanging out with the both of them and I used to wonder how both he and his sister turned out so wild when they had such a stern, disciplinarian-type drill Seargent type of a Father. I often sat there while he lectured one or both of them.
According to my "right-wing" belief system at the time, I thought these kids were some kind of weird anomaly. Two kids from an intact family home, both living wild and self-destructive (but-oh-so-fun) lifestyles.
Now, I do believe I know exactly why they turned out the way they did (and why I too got into so much trouble in my youth).
I now understand that the simple existence of a two parent household, while important, is certainly not the be all-end all of raising children to have successful families of their own and to becoming thoughtful, contributing members of society.
See, I now know that their can be worse situations than single mother households.
Just because parents are not divorced, doesn't really mean that a home can't be broken. Funny, how I used to think to myself about how these two were so screwed up...but I never made the association with my own situation, and why I too embraced a self-destructive lifestyle in my youth.
Looking back with "red-pill" induced clarity, I now understand exactly why these two kids took a path of dysfunction (as I similarly did). Their strict, harsh, disciplinarian father had zero authority in his home. And while the Father would get angry and go into tirades and try to mete out discipline for his children...their mother always intervened, interjected and undermined any sort of authority he tried to assert.
If he grounded them, she would give them permission to go out the minute he left the house.
If he tried to take away their things, she'd give it back to them.
If he cut off their allowance, she'd just give them the money when he wasn't looking.
She spoiled them rotten...and he knew it. And he never stood up to his wife's constant campaign to render his authority meaningless. She wore the proverbial pants.
He'd yell at them, and she'd jump right in and defend them, no matter what.
When the school called because the boy skipped school three days in a row, the father would start to yell at him, and his mother would immediately get in between them defend her son from the Father's wrath. Same thing when he got arrested for possession of cocaine and acid. When he got arrested for reckless endangerment for his crazy driving. No matter what, these kids had no consequences for their behavior...because their mother enabled them and the Father never stood up to her and called her on it. The mother had utter contempt for the Father. I now see this kind of home environment can be just as bad -- if not worse -- for children as a bitter divorce or abandoned by a deadbeat. It was much the same story I went through myself.
Gaining an understanding of this dynamic that they grew up in, I also now realize why the sister was such a serial monogamist - the very minute her boyfriends started "beta-izing," she'd lose all attraction for him, and either dump them, or begin to act so bitchy and aloof, he'd dump her. In essence, every new guy she began dating, was a potential male figure of authority that on a visceral, instinctual level, she needed to respect. As soon as she couldn't respect them anymore, it was over. She was essentially rejecting any male that became contemptible...unconsciously, she just couldn't bear to see herself fall into the same relationship dynamic as her parents.
Now, of course, thanks to facebook, I see that she's a single-mother career woman, turned cougar.
Her brother ended up in jail.
My own home life was a bit different, since religion played a prominent role in my own upbringing...but my mother's contempt for my Beta-provider Father certainly affected myself as well.
I don't think my Mother ever realized how destructive she was to my sibling's and my own personal development. The bitter contempt she expressed for my Father whenever he wasn't around. "YOUR FATHER" spit out in disgust was the daily epithet we heard from her as she complained about him on a regular basis. He could never do anything right. Ever. Oh, he sure tried his hardest. But my Father's church-based, white-night chivalry ideals combined with a supplicating, "what can I do to make you happy" demeanor drove my Mother's innate hypergamous instincts haywire.
The funny thing is that my grandfather was the complete opposite. He was certainly an old school 'player.' Until he died in his late 80's, my grandfather was the kind of man that could easily dominate any conversation in a room. He was a "natural." He also had multiple affairs on my Grandmother when they were dating (supposedly none after they married...but I wouldn't put it past the old goat). I think my Father was raised to be a supplicating Beta by my Grandmother constantly telling him to not be like his own father. She took him to a woman-pedestal-izing "Christian" church when he was a young boy and made sure he would not grow up to be a womanizer like his own Father.
My mother used to tell us that our Grandfather was a "terrible" man. That he was "abusive." What I now understand is that my Mother was observing how my Grandfather used to "neg" my Grandmother, and how he definitively "wore the pants." My Grandfather was a very dominant man and my Grandmother was certainly submissive to him. My mother couldn't stand going to their house for the holidays. It would drive her crazy to see my Grandfather say something like "Where's my dinner woman?!" and my Grandmother would quickly get to cooking in the kitchen.
In my mother's 1960's college indoctrinated mentality, my Grandfather was a chauvinist pig and my Grandmother, an oppressed slave catering to his every whim. It wasn't until I was a grown man and I saw my Grandparents die, that I began to understand that they truly loved each other. My Grandmother respected my Grandfather...and he truly loved her. I'll never forget standing at her hospital bedside, watching my Grandmother grasp my Grandfather's hand and telling him she loved him with all her heart and thanked him for a lifetime together. He was utterly heartbroken when she passed away. This was a complete and total shock to me. I had been brainwashed by my mother to believe that they had a sick, abusive relationship...that what they had was not "love."
Only now do I truly understand exactly who it is that has a sick, abusive relationship.
As a young teen, hearing a daily campaign of revulsion and contempt from my mother directed at my Father destroyed my own self-esteem and my own self-image. If your Father is such a piece of garbage, why than I must be one too. I used to hate my father with a passion...and that hatred also turned onto myself. When I looked in the mirror and saw that face that resembled my Father's, my mother's contempt for that similar face, had programmed me to develop a great deal of contempt for my own reflection in the mirror.
I now realize precisely why I myself embraced a self-destructive lifestyle as a teen and young adult. When it comes to hard drugs, and thrill seeking, reckless and suicidal behavior, I've been there and done that. I didn't care if I lived or died.
As I grew older and gained a real understanding of these things, I also went through a period of hatred for my mother. I've gotten over that now. I've gone through a pendulum of emotions and attitudes - from blaming my Father to blaming my Mother. I'm simply now past blame and recriminations. I've settled on simple acceptance. It is what it is, and I also realize that there are other people that have had far worse upbringings to deal with than what I went through. I now realize that my Mother is not totally to blame for her contempt of my Father...that my Father simply does not understand how his supplicating, "nice-guy" manner of dealing with my Mom is the very reason why she's such a bitchy nag to this very day.
But I thank God I have taken the "red-pill" and see such things clearly now. When my own children grow older, I think I have the knowledge to give them a much better home life than the one I grew up in.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
Our Dysfunctional Society was Deliberately Designed That Way
Thursday, February 11th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
An apropos variation of this blog-posting's title would be: Complete Population Control (It's not just about the birth rate.)
I, like many fellow Man-o-sphere bloggers, often refer to the Matrix red pill vs. blue pill allegory to describe the awakening or moment of awareness we undergo when we put aside the premises, assumptions and pretty lies of our mass media indoctrination that influences most people's understanding of what we mistakenly refer to as "conventional wisdom."
For many, they take the "red pill" concerning one specific area -- i.e. gender relations; the true nature of female sexuality; game; Marriage 1.0 vs. Marriage 2.0 etc. -- and upon gaining insight into a new paradigm, we open a little window of doubt into our formerly indoctrinated mental construct of the world. For some, that is all they are ever satisfied with. Many study the topics into extensive details,, continually deconstructing the pretty lies, taking them apart piece-by-piece, until they gain a full and comprehensive overview of that specific topics truths versus the misconceptions, illusions, delusions, memes and shibboleths of our BraveNewWorldOrder's propaganda-driven world view.
For others, like myself, gaining insights into one area of just how mass delusions are promulgated and accepted as the mainstream conventional wisdom begins a domino effect of cynical skepticism, bordering on paranoia. My initial quest in seeking to gain an understanding of how feminism corrupted marriage in this country has eventually lead me onto a path of studying and analyzing almost every aspect of life under our Brave New World Order. I began to question ALL conventional wisdom. From marriage laws, gender relations, dietary nutrition, education, science, money and finance, and politics. All of these areas that encompass all of our lives are literally influenced, directed...or more appropriately; HERDED by lies, propaganda, half-truths and disinformation. Himmler could only dream of the level of control over We the Sheeple's minds that today's social engineers exercise on the masses.
As far as I'm concerned, the lynch pin to gaining my understanding of the big picture came from combining all of the knowledge gleaned from years of blog reading with the insights provided by several seminal books that became available for free online - works that I would have never before walked into a bookstore and bought for myself. Books like those I've linked on my blogroll: The Underground History of America, The Deliberated Dumbing Down of America, The Garbage Generation, and most recently, Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in our Time.
I believe the evidence is overwhelming. I've put the pieces of the puzzle to together in my own mind, and I'm convinced that the conspiracy is indeed true. But in trying to impart this understanding to other people who haven't already done their own research into it, I've found is next to impossible. The inculcated programming to disbelieve all "conspiracy theory" is one of the strongest implanted ideas to overcome.
I've been rebuked, insulted, marginalized, ignored and castigated in many debates I've engaged in over the last couple of years; both online and in "real" life.* Once people find out that my basic premise involves pointing to the manipulation of every aspect of our reality by a powerful cabal of elites, working to bring the world under one world-communitarian governance...and that there primary weapon IS mass mind control...it seems to me that there is a deeply instilled mechanism that seems to kick in and causes most people to simply reject the entire argument. A reference to "conspiracy" has now come to mean Reptilian Satanists in UFO's to the average blue pill addict.
"C'mon man, you really believe that bullshit?!"
Mis-information and Dis-information is their most powerful means of maintaining their mass mind control. By subverting our societies churches, our educational system, our food supply, and most importantly our mass media, the social engineers behind all of this are actually the grand architects of our modern world. Why do we have a Government that is out of control and never seems to "fix" any of the problems they say they intend to? Why do we have a Government that endorses dietary guidelines and subsidized processed FEED that lead to an epidemic of degerative diseases amongst the populace? Why do we have a Government who's policies deliberately destroy the nuclear family structure that this nation was initially built upon? Why do we have a massive educational system that churns out a dumbed-down populace of sheeple easily mislead by tell-a-vision, news reporters and pseudo-scientists? These are all areas of our lives that are deeply dysfunctional if you live your life and formulate your behaviors based on the attitudes you've been TOLD to adopt by our culture. In short, we are a dysfunctional society, because the powers that be WANT IT THIS WAY.
When you unplug yourself from the matrix completely, in ALL facets of your life, you will finally see just how unbalanced, unnatural and corrupted our modern rat race of life within the matrix really is.
Once you take the red pill, there is no going back.
*I put "real" in quotes, in reference to the fact that red pill takers have a much different view of "real" life than your average blue pill swallower.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
The Married Man’s Last Stand
Monday, February 8th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
I watched the Superbowl yesterday -- good game. Unlike the rest of the NFL football season, I also watched the commercials. Throughout the 17 week season of the NFL, the large corporations that sponsor the games typically show the same 20 or so commericals over and over again during NFL game broadcasts. Such repetitive exposure to commercialized propaganda used to drive me insane.
But I love watching the NFL so much, I considered a nuisance I had to endure to get my enjoyment out of the spectacle of the human chess match that is professional NFL Football.
But a couple of years ago, I switched to a satellite broadcast company for my TV, shutting off the cable and have enjoyed a level of control over the idiot box I previously didn't think possible....with a 100 hour Digital Video Recorder receiver box, I've discovered the joys of recording all the games I want to watch, and than hitting the "skip forward 30 second" button on my remote. So while watching an NFL game, I can literally watch a 3 and-a-half hour broadcast in almost half the time sans all the commercials.
I've gone this entire season without watching even a single commercial.
But, of course, we all know that the Superbowl commands such a large audience, that advertisers will often pull out all the stops to create commercials that are memorable and humorous. So I do have to say, some of the commercials I saw certainly lived up to their Superbowl billing (not that I'm going to start drinking Bud Light and eat Doritos...but some of their commercials were entertaining)!
And...of course, as many people have noted, like everything else on 21st century idiot box, tell-a-vision programming, there were a fair share of misandrist themes found in many commercials. Jay Hammers offered a quick synopsis with youtube links over at the Spearhead highlighting some of the more egregious offenders.
But one commercial really stood out for me...the Dodge Chargers "Man's Last Stand" commercial.
Here's the transcript of the narrative:
I will get up and walk the dog at 6:30am.
I will eat fruit as a part of my breakfast.
I will shave...I will clean the sink afterI shave.
I will be at work by 8 am...I will sit through 2 hour meetings.
I will say yes when you want me to say yes.
I will be quiet when you don't want to hear me say no.
I will take your call..I will listen to your opinion of my friends.
I will listen to your friends opinions of my friends.
I will be civil to your mother.
I will put the seat down...I will separate the recycling.
I will carry your lip balm.
I will watch your vampire TV shows with you.
I will take your socks off before getting into bed.
I will put my underwear in the basket...
And because I do this...I will drive the car, I want to drive.
My first thought was: "And because of this, you will be driving the car you want to drive...while struggling to put gas in the tank because you have to pay your court ordered alimony and child support payments because your now ex-wife couldn't stand being married to an utterly dominated, spineless, feminized little boy, begging Mommy's permission to do anything.
This is THE primary way in which the typical marriage is now portrayed by 21st century tell-a-vision. PUA game lingo refers to the average, plain guy who can't get laid as an Average Frustrated Chump, or: AFC...well tell-a-vision usually portrays the typical married man as an AMC.
I've gotten into my share of arguments over time with various folks in the Man-o-sphere regarding the topics of marriage..I don't intend to rehash them here. However, I will say, any man that is married or is getting married, you need to understand a basic truth here: any marriage that is modeled after the AMC template as promoted by our mass media culture, is one destined for failure and unhappiness.
Women are hypergamous. That means if she can rule you, she will not respect you. If she can't respect you, she certainly can't lust you. And if she can't lust you...
We all know how that ends up in our Brave New World Order's family court system.
Anyhow, I thought I'd give it a go to see how this commercial would be like if it were based on a Man who understands what HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD means:
You need to start getting up and walking the dog at 6:30am...you're starting to look a little hefty...you wouldn't want to turn into one of those people of walmart cows?!
You will add some fruit to my breakfast that you are cooking...but DON'T overcook the eggs.
I will shave...I will clean the sink after I shave as well as that clump of your hair out of the bathroom drain...because as the MAN, I realize that the nasty, dirty jobs are MY job around here...and while I do all the things you simply cannot bear to do, like haul the garbage, kill the rodents and insects and yes, clean hair clogs out of drains, you should be cooking me some food or washing the dishes and not complaining about how you "Do Everything Around Here!" Because you don't.
I will be at work by 8 am...I will sit through 2 hour meetings. Because I'm the provider, and I will endure whatever it takes to provide for this household.
I will NEVER say yes when you want me to say yes. If you don't like what I have to say, than make me a sandwich.
You will be quiet when I am doing something that has my interest and requires my concentration.
I will take your call...if I feel like it. If not, I'll call you back later.
I will listen to your opinion of my friends...I may or may not agree with you, but you will NOT choose my friends for me.
What was that your friends said about my friends? Don't they have better things to do than gossip about MY friends?
I will be civil to your mother...if she is civil to me. Respect is a two way street. I have no problem being respectful...to a respectful person in kind.
Put the seat down yourself and quit your squawking....is it really that big a deal for something that takes no time and almost no effort to put it up or down?
I will separate the recycling...after all, that's all bottles from my beer. I'll separate them and turn them in to the collection center, so I can take the refund and buy more beer. See...I got this recycling thing down pat.
Here...carry your own lip balm...isn't that why you carry a purse with everything but the kitchen sink in it in the first place? In fact, while your at it, here...put this in your purse until I need it.
Watch your vampire TV shows when I'm not around. Better yet, stop watching that garbage. Read a book.
I will wear whatever I want to wear before getting into bed...if you don't like it, you can always take the couch.
I will put my underwear in the basket when I'm good and ready to have my laundry done.
And because I do this...I will drive the car, I want to drive, while you can drive the mini-van I bought for you to take the kids to soccer practice.
Wouldn't it be great to see a commercial like that?
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
The System Was Designed to Make Us Go Mad
Monday, February 1st, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
I spent this past weekend in a state of introspective contemplation, trying to grasp the enormity of all the issues and topics that I've spent the last several years reading, researching and blogging about. It has been like a continuous process of finding the metaphorical pieces of an enormous jigsaw puzzle, and as each piece fell into place, the picture finally begins to emerges in it's entirety.
The most prominent thought that emerged from my ruminations has been just how unnatural we live out our lives in this BraveNewWorldOrder. To use one of their indoctrination phrases...this is UNSUSTAINABLE.
I think one finds balance, peace of mind and an inner equilibrium when we live our existence in accordance with our natural state of being. This is why we now live in a carefully constructed, artificial reality shaped by endless repetitions of memes, disinformation and propaganda inculcated through mass media indoctrination and bureaucratic institutional brainwashing.
This subversion of our natural state of equilibrium is so complete, so encompassing, so pervasive...that once you grasp the enormity of just how many areas of your life they have affected, effected, conditioned, molded and steered, you can ONLY conclude that it has been done on purpose...with deliberate intent.
The social engineers that have shaped our society and our culture have a full, working knowledge of our human natures, our desires, our biological imperatives, and our instinctive proclivities...and they have deliberately and deviously gone about subverting, distorting and contorting those needs, wants and desires to create a script for which we unknowingly and unwittingly follow...immersing ourselves into lives of artificial constructs that deliberately go against our natural state of equilibrium.
If you ever feel like you're going crazy in a world gone mad, that is precisely your cognitive dissonance of your natural instincts clashing with the unnatural script you are trying to follow to achieve "success" and "happiness." This purposely instilled discombobulation was designed to leave you confused, tired, overworked, and in ill health, unable to contemplate their devious machinations to subtly and covertly control your life.
To put it in even simpler terms - to render you easily manipulated, our BraveNewWorldOrder's social engineers have deliberately scrambled our understanding of gender relationship roles, familial roles, dietary nutrition and health, understanding of finance and economics, and a proper understanding of education.
They've created a society for which the cultural inertia pushes us into debt slavery -- student loans to finance education to achieve certification to become an entry level human resource for a corporation so you can eventually qualify for a 30 year mortgage, multiple auto loans, and credit card debt to pursue materialistic consumerist satisfaction to try and derive meaning from your otherwise scripted and empty existence.
They've created a society for which cultural inertia pushes us into dysfunctional familial relationships mediated by an interloping State authority.
They've created a society for which we ignore all of these manifestations of population control by focusing on a mass media constructed fantasy to keep us all distracted and mind-numbingly complacent and ignorant.
They've created a society for which cultural inertia pushes us into bad dietary lifestyles, unhealthy addictions and a health care "system" that profits off of our misery and sickness.
In other words, they treat us like the sheeple that we are. We've been herded, branded, fattened, sheered and eventually led to slaughter...
There's only one way to refuse and resist:
Stop drinking the kool aid.
Stop taking the blue pill.
Unplug from the Matrix.
Seek out the truth, and find your peace.
But most of all, Hope for the best...
...while preparing for the worst.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
Expanding the Taxonomy of Male Classifications
Friday, January 29th, 2010
By Hawaiian Libertarian [source]
Eveybody's favorite Christian Libertarian anarchist blogger, Vox Day, recently posted about Roissy and his practice of classifying men into the Alpha/Beta dichotomy.
VD wrote a pretty good taxonomy that definitely expands on what many critics of game and Roissy have always pointed out as Roissy's ideological weakness in using only two definitions of male behavior on the spectrum of male value in the sexual marketplace's hierarchy.
Before I present Vox's list, I do want to note that I think Roissy's focus on a Alpha/Beta dichotomy is useful as an intro for people who have never heard of "game" in the first place to gain a solid understanding of the differences in male behavior and demeanor.
Vox's expanded taxonomy seems to be a pretty good breakdown that accounts for all of the variations people always seem to question Roissy about. Roissy's comments are often filled with queries about behaviors such as "Is this "beta" or "alpha?" Am I a "greater beta" or a lesser alpha." Etc.
Perhaps Vox gives us a more useful taxonomy here:
Alphas - the male elite, the leaders of men for whom women naturally lust. Their mere presence sets women a-tingle regardless of whether she is taken or not. Once you've seen beautiful married women ignoring tall, handsome, wealthy, and even famous men because that ugly old troll Henry Kissinger walked in the room, you simply can't deny the reality of Alphadom. Example: Captain Kirk, Big from Sex in the City. Suggestion: Do you see a scoreboard? Right, so relax already!
Betas - the lieutenants, the petty aristocracy. They're popular, they do well with women, they're pretty successful in life, and they may even be exceptionally good-looking. But they lack the Alpha's natural self-confidence and strength of character. They're not leaders and they're not the men to whom women are helplessly drawn. Most men who like to think they're Alphas because of their success are actually Betas. Most Betas won't change their game because they don't really have any need or reason to do so. This is probably the easiest social slot in which to find yourself, since the Beta enjoys many of the benefits of Alphadom without being trapped in the Alpha's endless cycle of competition. Example: Brad Pitt Suggestion: Have some compassion for the less naturally fortunate. Try to include them once in awhile.
Deltas - the great majority of men. These are Roissy's Betas. Almost all of you reading this are Deltas despite the natural desire to believe that you are a brave and bold Alpha snowflake notwithstanding. Deal with it. There's absolutely nothing wrong with being a Delta, it's just a simple statistical and observable reality. The sooner you accept the truth about yourself, the sooner you will be able to control your unconscious inclinations and modify your behavior in a manner that will help you achieve your goals. I've gone out of alphabetical order here because delta symbolizes change, which most Deltas are capable to some extent. Hence the synthetic alpha instruction set known as Game. Example: Probably you. Suggestion: Never forget that there are plenty of girls on the girl tree.
Gammas - the obsequious ones, the posterior puckerers, the nice guys who attempt to score through white-knighting, faux-chivalry, flattery, and omnipresence. All men except true Alphas will occasionally fall into Gamma behavior from time to time, this is the behavior and attitude that Roissy is attempting to teach men to recognize and avoid. The dividing line between a Gamma and a Delta is that the Gamma genuinely believes in the Gamma reality to the very core of his soul whereas the Delta is never truly comfortable with himself when he behaves in this manner despite being thoroughly indoctrinated in it by his culture. Example: Probably you if you've found yourself complaining about your lack of female companionship over the last two years. Suggestion: Remember that the statement "all are fallen" applies to women too. She isn't any more naturally pure or holy or ethereal than you are.
Lambdas - the gays. They have their own social hierarchy. They can fill any role from Alpha to Omega, but they tend to play the part rather than actually be it because the heterosexual social construct only encompasses the public part of their lives. Example: Neil Patrick Harris. Suggestion: Straights will be more tolerant if you keep the bathhouse behavior behind closed doors.
Sigmas - the lone wolves. Occasionally mistaken for Alphas, particularly by women and Alphas, they are not leaders and will actively resist the attempt of others to draft them. Alphas instinctively view them as challenges and either dislike or warily respect them. Some Deltas and most Omegas fancy themselves Sigmas, but the true Sigma's withdrawal from the pack is not a reaction to the way he is treated, it is pure instinct. Example: Clint Eastwood's movie persona. Suggestion: Entertain the possibility that other people are not always Hell. The banal idiocy is incidental, it's not intentional torture.
Omegas - the losers. Even the Gamma males despise them. That which doesn't kill them can make them stronger, but most never surmount the desperate need to belong caused by their social rejection. Omegas can be the most dangerous of men because the pain of their constant rejection renders the suffering of others completely meaningless in their eyes. Omegas tend to cluster in defensive groups; the dividing line between the Omega and the Sigma is twofold and can be easily recognized by a) the behavior of male Betas and Deltas and b) the behavior of women. Women tend to find outliers attractive in general, but while they respond to Sigmas almost as strongly as they do to Alphas, they correctly find Omega males creepier and much scarier than Gamma males. Example: Eric Harris Suggestion: Your rejection isn't entirely personal. Observe the difference in your own behavior and the way the Betas act. And try not to start off conversations with women by sharing "interesting facts" with them.
Topics: Hawaiian Libertarian | Comments
« Previous Entries