One For All
Article Summary
- A couple of ugly dudes.. [2009-Aug-8]
- Christian J. on Youtube.. [2009-May-23]
- Amfortas and Christian J: Lying About Domestic Violence.. [2009-May-9]
- Podcasts.. [2009-Apr-19]
- Give A Dog A Bad Name Part 1 and 2 [2009-Apr-19]
- Feminism is Not Good For Women Part One and Two [2009-Apr-19]
A couple of ugly dudes..
Saturday, August 8th, 2009
By One For All [source]
Christian J..
Amfortas..
Topics: One For All | Comments Off
Christian J. on Youtube..
Saturday, May 23rd, 2009
By One For All [source]
Writers warned to tow the politically correct line about women.. by Christian J.
"Political correctness", "feminist ideology", "writers block", sexism.
The New Zealand Government has instigated guidelines for writers on "How Women are to be described and characterized" according to feminist ideology as well the politically correct notion that we are the product of our environment and not according to our DNA and sex.
Topics: One For All | Comments Off
Amfortas and Christian J: Lying About Domestic Violence..
Saturday, May 9th, 2009
By One For All [source]
The ‘woman’s Safety Survey’ was “uncorroborated, biased and manipulated” ‘Advocacy research’ orchestrated by the Office for the Status of Women and passed off as Bureau of Statistics report. It caused an enormous row, says MRA Amfortas. Manipulated definitions and hysterical claims copied from America made innocuous behaviour criminal. DV sells commercial products to women and expropriates public funds for the fastest growing ‘Industry in Australia.
Three other sources of ‘official’ data which are routinely manipulated and presented to support DV lies are analysed by Amfortas and compared to Independent University research which completely contradicts the ‘official message’.” It would be generous to think that this manipulation and bias was just the result of incompetence. But as we can see there is something far darker behind it. It is corruption. It is deliberate.”
Christian J narrates how the 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Personal Safety Survey completely contradicted the Government’s 1996 survey. He also points to the attempts by feminist bureaucrats to manipulate by having ONLY female interviewers to bias the results. Results show women twice as safe as men. The Government has thrown a blanket of silence over it. Feminists maintain an undemocratic stranglehold, expropriating public monies for their anti-male ‘Industry’.
Topics: One For All | View Comments
Podcasts..
Sunday, April 19th, 2009
By One For All [source]
Everyday Family Terrorism
“When Momma ain’t Happy, Nobody’s Happy”. Amfortas and Paul Elam show how domestic violence and a lot worse are often caused by ‘controlling’ women who are willing to destroy their families to have their own way. Dr Eric Berne’s ‘Games’ are described including the major cause of broken families, the “Let’s you and Him Fight” strategy which uses the Police and Family Courts.
The Wages of Spin
Amfortas narrates the analysis of Paul Elam of the Pay Gap Myth, showing the mendacious and partial statistics promoted by politicians to anger women for political advantage. Women’s choices are intelligent and nurturing while mennot only work longer hours but take the dangerous jobs that pay more. Dr Warren Farrell’s early rationales are sustained.
Is Feminism a Hate Movement?
Amfortas narrates Fidelbogan’s established, clear and logical analysis of the links between the spectrum of disaffection feelings that women have for men and the rise and sustenance of Feminism. This spectrum is lead from the top by hateful, sociopathic women and supported by ‘rent-seeking scum’ women in growing bureaucracie, who take immoral advantage.
The Degradation of Women – by feminism
“In textbook leftist style, feminist supporters of the play ’Vagina Monologues’ cloak their attack on normal family values and morality under the guise of promoting awareness about violence against women. One does not have to be a prude to see a weak excuse for pornographyand an anti-male agenda. But to disguise it as ‘awareness of abuse’, is an abuse of women’s minds and sensibilities.” Amfortas lauds Bridget Blanton for her stand and protests and against the glorification of lesbian rape of young girls.
A female economist takes on a leading Feminist in a debate. Women’s Studies Depts’ have no legitimacy and should be closed. They are academically bogus and “Ideologically biased”. A men’s Studies Dept could be better trusted to seek truth and answers to urgent social questions. Women dominate Universities and are driven by bias.
A ‘Life studies dept’ would serve society better than a ‘woman’s studies Dept. “50 million unborn babies have died for women’s rights”. Enough is enough. University cobbled Feminists ‘cherry pick’ studies and ignore contrary evidence to present false ideas to the public, corrupting their intellectual obligation and actively creating and manipulating a negative and destructive image about men.
The ‘woman’s Safety Survey’ was “uncorroborated, biased and manipulated” ‘Advocacy research’ orchestrated by the Office for the Status of Women and passed off as Bureau of Statistics report. It caused an enormous row, says MRA Amfortas. Manipulated definitions and hysterical claims copied from America made innocuous behaviour criminal. DV sells commercial products to women and expropriates public funds for the fastest growing ‘Industry in Australia.
Three other sources of ‘official’ data which are routinely manipulated and presented to support DV lies are analysed by Amfortas and compared to Independent University research which completely contradicts the ‘official message’.” It would be generous to think that this manipulation and bias was just the result of incompetence. But as we can see there is something far darker behind it. It is corruption. It is deliberate.”
Christian J narrates how the 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Personal Safety Survey completely contradicted the Government’s 1996 survey. He also points to the attempts by feminist bureaucrats to manipulate by having ONLY female interviewers to bias the results. Results show women twice as safe as men. The Government has thrown a blanket of silence over it. Feminists maintain an undemocratic stranglehold, expropriating public monies for their anti-male ‘Industry’.
A professional analysis of the Family Court’s ‘Bible’ that justifies the ‘ least detrimental alternatives’ to the traditional family. “We have a generation of fathers who are shell-shocked, heartbroken”. It was Adolph Hitler who first said that people will take any reduction to their freedom if you tell them it is in the best interests of the children. Could we not have a non-detrimental alternative, Amfortas asks.
The Family Court brings about the detrimental conditions that lead to a delinquent culture of fatherlessness in children. The ‘most deserving parent’ is chosen on genitalia. Professionals make judgements that cause parental alienation syndrome. A juggernaut is driven over Magna Carta. An equal society is replaced by a superior class of people.
This podcast covers the " Can Boys Survive School", when almost every single issue is catered towards women whereas boy education has just been put on hold and completely ignored. Nothing is too great a hurdle when ensuring that girls succeed but no one gives a damn if a boy fails..
Topics: One For All | Comments Off
Give A Dog A Bad Name Part 1 and 2
Sunday, April 19th, 2009
By One For All [source]
Topics: One For All | Comments Off
Feminism is Not Good For Women Part One and Two
Sunday, April 19th, 2009
By One For All [source]
Topics: One For All | Comments Off