One Man’s Kingdom
« Previous EntriesArticle Summary
- Why Marriage is Dying [2009-Apr-4]
- Worldwide Men’s Strike [2009-Mar-25]
- Imagine [2009-Jan-18]
- Spring [2008-Oct-1]
- Marxists and Other Uppity Politicians [2008-Sep-24]
- Closed For The Day [2008-Sep-16]
- International MGTOW Day [2008-Sep-14]
- Women’s Porn [2008-Sep-5]
- The Decline Continues [2008-Aug-22]
- Growth of MGTOW [2008-Aug-20]
- « Previous Articles
Why Marriage is Dying
Saturday, April 4th, 2009
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
Oceans full of vast plankton numbers will eventually bring forth creatures as large as whales that will consume in volumes equal to the resource available. Great numbers of whales will draw out enormous numbers of humans to plunder them in turn. Today, all the resources we live off - our fisheries, our arable lands, our fresh water - are rapidly being depleted. At the same time, our numbers and waist-lines are increasing. The connection is too obvious.
The labour of men is a resource too. Kings and women have recognised this for as long as humanity has existed. The king, or his modern day equivalent, exploits this resource through taxes and compulsory service. Women exploit it through marriage.
It's clear to see who the beneficiaries of marriage are, even if one only looks at the direction its legal reform takes. In the past 200 years, marriage has been radically altered. Fathers lost automatic custody of their children. Women became able to divorce unilaterally. A man's assets were re-branded 'marital property' and then control of them handed to the wife. 'Marital Rape' was established as a crime, and used with great effect to diminish a husband's status in the relationship. All reforms have been to benefit women, without exception. None have been actioned to benefit men as a group (although it's easy to find many men who are glad to be divorced).
What all these reforms represent is not so much the truth of the parasitic nature of the relationship, but the exercise of that biological law. Men's labour, once abundant, has now been exploited by its natural predator to the point that it is becoming scarce. Marriage is dying as surely as the Atlantic fishing industry. When you take far more than can be replenished, you end up with nothing, sooner or later.
One of the more interesting aspects of this phenomenon is the near blanket ban on informed commentary. In our more innocent years, we might have expected the media and academia to have kept tabs on any significant social development such as this, but they are less than useless on this subject. In fact, they tend to be agents of disinformation more than illuminators of mystery on this and several similar issues. The reasons are simple.
The media, contrary to their own P.R., are not voices of the public interest. They are salesmen. Everything they publish or broadcast is done with a view to their profitability. Women control 80% of all consumer spending, and wherever a man and woman buy cars or real estate together, it is the woman who decides 95% of the time. For the media, women are the only people that matter. No media will offend its most valued customers, and it certainly won't tell them that men are increasingly finding them odious and dangerous to be around. If there will be any coverage of the demise of marriage, it will be reframed to give the impression that it is women who are turning their backs on it.
Academia, apart from being dominated now by women, has other reasons for being ineffective. Throughout history, whenever intellectual muscle has had nothing to push against but the unknown, it has amazed us in its ability to cast light on what was once darkness. It is for this reason that we have so much respect for learning - we know what it can do, we have already seen it do great things. However, everything changes when the academic begins to inquire into matters that may compromise the interests of other people of influence. Galileo found this out when he probed the night sky with the telescope of his own invention and began to realise he could prove Copernicus's assertion that the Earth circled the sun. This huge advance in scientific knowledge, not only the fact but his method, earned him the unwelcome attention of the powerful Roman church. Galileo was contradicting the received view of the powers of his time. He was tried, found suspect of heresy, and spent the rest of his life under house arrest.
Such is the case now within our universities. The hard sciences and mathematics continue to astonish us as they explore ever further into territory unguarded by any gate-keeper, but as the focus of academic thought falls into any line of study that is already dominated by vested interests, progress slows or stops. Psychology, History, Sociology, Anthropology, Political Science and Law are not so much academic pursuits as they are citadels of special interest. They have become the new church of our time, with their established received views of how the world is. The academic is as much a defender of established faith today as he has always been (note that it was the church that established universities in the first place, for the training of the faithful).
However, whether our institutions care to acknowledge the truth ar continue to wallow in denial, the reality of marriage's decline continues unabated. Eventually even the most stubborn deniers will either relent or die. But don't expect any golden era of informed thought to follow. As usual, the traps of deceit will be set for the unwary in the future as well, only the deception will take a novel form. There is only one simple test to brave it all - who gets the benefit of your labour? You, or someone else?
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | View Comments
Worldwide Men’s Strike
Wednesday, March 25th, 2009
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
Make a statement, call in sick, take it as a holiday. Protest or just tell some people about it.
We are looking for some very basic things.
1. Equal rights in the eyes of family and criminal courts for men and women. Equality in sentencing.
2. The end of quotas in all employment opportunities.
3. Fairness in education, end universities female quotas system. Entry should be based on marks only.
4. An end to all laws and quotas that favour a person because of sex or race. We support true equality.
All you have to do is pass on the info and date. Talk about, blog about it. Email your friends and maybe a few media outlets. The least you can do is pass it to five more people.
Ongoing information at http://globalmensstrike.blogspot.com/
NOTE: The above web-site may be difficult to read on your browser. If so, please leave a comment for the blogger so that he may know the extent of this problem.
Contact: encryption1@ymail.com
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | View Comments
Imagine
Sunday, January 18th, 2009
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
Imagine that, as a man, when you go up town, 4 out of every 5 shops caters to your tastes: there are outdoor pursuits shops, electronic hobby specialists, motorcycle shops, robot and computer kitset specialists, sports gear specialists staffed with former sports stars, telescope and other astronomical instruments, real ale pubs, boating and fishing stores, hunting guides, mountain climbing equipment, self-defence training with experts - shops of this nature on every block. Of course it only follows that you also have plenty of money to spend in these shops, otherwise they wouldn't be there. There are a few stores for women, but they cater mainly for basic things like clothes, footwear and household appliances. Enough to dress them and keep them busy should they have any spare time on their hands.
Imagine also that should you tire of working for a living, you can unilaterally decide to quit your job and live off your wife. Everyone accepts that as fair. You don't have to do anything - you can even have an affair with another woman (or man if you are that way inclined). Should your wife become difficult and object to your freedom, you can divorce her at the drop of a hat, and she will be removed from your house and ordered to have no contact with your children except at times ordered by a court. Oh yes, you will get the kids, as well as an income from this troublesome woman. The courts may well order her to pay more to you than what she actually earns (she will have no legal redress either). If she fails to pay you, she will be jailed. If she threatens you in any way, the police will be onto her so fast she won't know what hit her, and she will be ordered to attend classes to confess to anger management problems, and to maintain a distance between you and her, under pain of imprisonment. If you fear she may strike you unawares, you can even kill her and this will likely be considered a mitigating circumstance in your trial.
In this imaginary world, you can buy anything you want and should your wife try to limit your access to what she earns, you can have her charged for spousal abuse. Should your easy spending bankrupt the household, it will be her that is saddled with the debt, not you.
When you turn on the television set, everything you watch will tell you what a splendid fellow you are and reassure you that you were born superior. Women will be depicted as idiots in all the commercials and men will be quiet, but assertive, role models of higher judgement and taste. All the dramas will show women doing all kinds of unspeakable evil to you, but they will always get caught and meet either a grisly or humiliating end. In any conflict where there is large-scale killing, all the bodies will be female. Women everywhere will rush to your defence, because it pains them to see a man in any kind of distress. In those countries that practice capital punishment, women are routinely executed. In the Arab world you can wander down to watch the public executions and see several women all hanged at the same time. The images are broadcast throughout the country to dissuade women from their criminal tendencies.
You can avail yourself of scholarships that only men are entitled to receive, and when you go to university, most of the students there will be men like yourself. Your point of view carries much more weight simply because you are a man, and should you want men-only facilities - a gymnasium for example - you shall get them. You will be constantly told that if the world was run by men only, all its current problems would disappear, and that women are less competent than you are. Of course, your graduation rates will be much higher than women students, and academically boys will routinely outperform girls at all levels of education.
The government will spend twice as much on your health concerns than it does on women, it will always consider the effect on men before passing any legislation, and it will make special provisions for your poverty should you be so unfortunate. Most of the homeless will be women. The jails will be full of women.
You can expect to live longer than women by a margin of 5 years. Women will commit suicide at a rate of 4 to every 1 man. No-one, anywhere will consider either of these statistics of any importance.
Should your country ever be threatened from abroad, the women are conscripted and sent off to fight for 'their' country, while you get to stay home and cheer from your armchair. Many of them will be killed or horribly maimed. This is one of the rare things that women do for you that you will publically honour.
You will receive wealth from a greater number of sources: inheritances, spousal support when married, alimony/child support when divorced and government pensions. In the work-force, where you do the same job as a woman, you will get the same income. However, since you spend so much more of your time doing things other than working, and choosing not to do the dangerous and dirty kind of work that women do, on average, women will out-earn you and hold a higher percentage of that very small number of jobs at the very top that demand every minute of their lives. Jobs for which these women are extremely well-paid, but ultimately you will get their money for it anyhow, in the form of taxes paid for your benefit, inheritances received as husbands due to women's earlier deaths and spousal maintenance/alimony/child support/divorce settlements.
As a man, you would probably be at least a little uncomfortable with such a world.
With the roles reversed, as a woman you would consider this normal life, but be mightily peeved that men enjoyed any advantage at all.
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | Comments Off
Spring
Wednesday, October 1st, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
What I had more in mind was something more positive - my own foray away from the general current we all tend to get dragged along by if we pay no particular attention to what we are doing with our lives. Like most men, I pretty much accepted the cultural scenery as a given and the rules and customs of our times as something over which we had little control. Also like most men, the idea of Freedom had an irresistible allure to it, but the practise of it seemed nowhere evident. It was as if we in the West sang ourselves to sleep with the lullaby of our freedom, while in reality we were all locked in small cells. With each passing day, it seemed as if Freedom was being stifled, and that even a pretence to it was beginning to be abandoned.
However, I had made a rather critical error in assuming that freedom is, or ever was, possible in a community of people.
Sharing space with others, invariably having priorities of their own, always means a competition of interests is at work. The more people live in close proximity, the more interdependent they become, the less autonomy any one individual has, and ultimately Freedom becomes an ideal, rather than an attainable end. The closest any of us can come to reaching true freedom is to mark out a small space of our own that we allow no other to enter, and to do for ourselves all that is required to sustain our lives in bearable comfort. This is what I set out to do 3 years ago when I closed my office, said my last goodbye to my clients and installed myself in a small cottage far from the noise of traffic deep in the New Zealand bush overlooking the sea.
My plan was a simple one, but an ambitious one as well. I wanted to completely remove myself from dependency of every sort, then having removed every uninvited influence and hold on my life, to then re-engage only in those ways that I had deliberated over and chosen specifically for myself. In this way I could at last claim to be living a deliberate and examined life. I cannot claim to know exactly what it is that propels me to want to do this, given that most people seem settled in whatever places they find themselves, but I can say that I am grateful for its guidance: a life of solitude, reflection and self-reliance seems now to me to be the most natural and satisfying life that I could live. All other modes of living that I have engaged in - active family life, busy professional career, dating and cohabiting with women, the usual ensemble of friends and the social life that goes with them - all seem now to have been stages in a progression toward the completion of the adult self.
There is an honesty that the self demands when there are no others around to deceive, and this constant demand for the truth, day in day out, of one's every motive soon begins to have a positive influence on the mind itself. The practice of self-reliance also asserts this same primacy of truth. No amount of excuse making or finger pointing will disguise the fact that the potatoes haven't been planted, or the tomatoes well-watered. An empty parlour in winter means I didn't take care enough to stock it with the summer's surplus.
Every action of importance has a consequence. Every lie is transparent. Every thought is judged. Every interaction with others reflected upon. And strange as this may seem, after so much scrutiny, a more natural and tranquil personality develops.
It is the springtime that has reminded me of my original purpose, and no doubt it was this very same time of year a full year ago that motivated me to record whatever progress I was making for whomever might be interested in the first place.
Spring here is the most violent and unpredictable season. Right now, rain is driving hard against my window and I can barely see through it more than 100 yards distant. I am in shirt-sleeves, but only an hour ago I was in full winter dress as strong south-westerly breezes brought very cold winds straight off the sea in strong gusts that rocked the house on its foundations. There will be spells later on this afternoon where the rain-clouds will thin, the sun will make an appearance and the spring warmth will see clouds of heavy mist oozing out of the thick bush on the steeper slopes. Already my grape plant is budding, as are the blue-berries and the lemon tree is well into its spring burst of flower, alongside the autumn season's fruit that are now almost orange with ripeness.
My garden beds, all non-existent 3 years ago, are now heaped high with the black, loamy soil of my own making, a product of fallen branches, fern trimmings, all my junk mail, all organic refuge and the fibrous tissue of all the previous year's vegetables. When I first moved here, nothing edible would grow - the ground is naturally a dense clay, hard as concrete in summer and like a thick, heavy porridge in the wetter months. There was no digging or ploughing it. All that I could do was leave the clay undisturbed and cover it with the contents of a few sacks of compost bought at the local garden store, held in place by a few boards standing on their edges and restrained by some bricks. The first year's results from this impromptu garden were so good that I went on to making more beds of the same design, only I resolved to make the soil myself out of all the waste I had at my disposal. It's a peculiar thing that of all the skills I have had to develop, it's the making of rich, fertile soil that I am proudest of.
Other unexpected discoveries have been the wild and unusual plants that have turned out to be far superior in taste and nutritional value than the regular sickly things that I used to buy in super-markets. Wild cresses, carrots, onions and small strawberry like berries abound here, and the cresses in particular prosper throughout the winter months. Sorrel, mustard and chard also grow with no need for care, and having been left to grow and seed on their own accord require no labour of mine other than that needed to pick them.
In tandem with my peculiar variety of foods I’ve also developed a peculiar style of cuisine. Having no other critic but my own taste buds - and they have surprised me in being far more accommodating than I would have thought possible - the food I now serve myself is no longer recognisable to civilised fare. Every now and then when I get called into the city and have to dine out, I wonder how I could ever have eaten what is routinely served up and not noticed how overdone everything is. No doubt any visitor to my humble household would be equally amazed at the savagery of my daily diet. My favourite cooking pleasure is the bread I bake from nothing more than flour, a little salt, baker’s yeast and the soaked grains of the wheat and oats that I grow myself. With a glass of wine, the smell of a freshly baked loaf wafting through my house, the blue of the ocean to contemplate and the song of the warblers, kingfishers and fantails playing at me from the surrounding bush, I am reminded that however much there may be wrong with the world, there’s still plenty right with it as well.
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | Comments Off
Marxists and Other Uppity Politicians
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
Maybe Marxists think they rule the world through the use of the dialectic. I'm more inclined to say 'People lie to get what they want. Big time'.
I have nowhere seen anything to make me believe that people can lay down plans 100 years in advance, with exact outcomes in mind, and have the brain-power, organisational discipline and resources to see that plan executed to the letter. Most of the socialists I've ever met couldn't balance their own cheque-books.
It all seems far simpler to me to assume that we all adapt quickly to change, and that we have much less control over what forces that change than we would like to believe. The change isn't the result of carefully thought out plans crafted by master-mind politicos, but it is imposed on us from that enormous unknowable beyond our power - what the word 'God' would serve adequately to describe, whether you are religious or not. It's not difficult to recognise patterns in the nature of change, and to notice a fairly uniform way in which humanity has responded to change - with a little reflection one can soon come up with slogan-like summaries of the dynamics of human response. This is all I think the Marxists have done. The Book of Revelation is another good example. Astrologers do it too. Know-alls making finding the sum of 2 and 2 seem like an enormous feat of intellect.
In my own inquiries into my own family's past recently, back into earlier centuries, I've been blown away at how controlling earlier societies have been, and how absolutely governments ruled and controlled their captive people. The state didn't need the same detail of regulation that we see today because everybody was pinned to one spot by the necessity of working for a living and not having anything other than a pair of legs or a neighbour's horse to get anywhere. Just think for a minute how different our lives today would be if we no longer had cheap transport. Terrorism as we know it and anonymous crime would fall away. Outsourcing would end. Local industry and agriculture would return out of necessity. Obesity and diabetes would drop away. Our communities would become safer. All without the need for the state to pass a single new law. Most existing law would become redundant. I'm not saying that any of this would make the end of the personal car a desirable thing - only that something as mundane as the price of oil would have an effect on us and our society far more compelling and beyond our control than anything some dead left-wing academic could dream up.
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | Comments Off
Closed For The Day
Tuesday, September 16th, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
For the last couple of days, I've been thinking about how I should best observe it.
It's clear to me now what is most appropriate.
It shall be a day of mourning.
A day of respect for all those men who lost their lives, health and sanity fighting for their country, and in exchange, got this.
A day of respect for all the men who spent years in jail for false rape accusations, and for those who are still there.
A day for all those men who are working and raising the children of other men; those who do it willingly, those who were tricked into it and those who still don't know that their children are not actually theirs.
A day for all those men who live hard, sleeping in their cars or in single rooms to meet their court-ordered payments to an ex-wife who lives in comfort.
A day for every single man for whom it all became too hard to bear and killed themselves. Whose deaths are never remarked, reported anywhere or accorded value by anyone.
A day for all those men who have died or been maimed doing the hardest, most dangerous jobs that society relies upon to function.
And finally a day for all men, everywhere in the Western World, who have been legally reduced to the property of women.
So rather than the minute of silence accorded the passing of someone notable, tomorrow I shall be passing a day of silence out of respect for all men.
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | Comments Off
International MGTOW Day
Sunday, September 14th, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
It has been such a runaway success that if you do a Google search on 'United Mens Day', you will find my blog and that of GR's at the top of the list, and that's about it. Hardly anyone anywhere is interested in a United Men's Day, regardless of the day of the year.
But I will observe it anyway, because I like the idea of being completely ignored whilst I observe a day dedicated to all the men whose existence on this planet is also completely ignored.
One of the good things about being on one's own, is that one gets to dictate how things are done. It's my intention to pass the day with all media off, seeing as how they are all shrines to the female. I shall read no newspaper, watch no TV, listen to no radio. I shall glance away whenever I see a woman, either in the flesh or in image. I shall not visit any shop, nor eat anything prepared by a woman's hand. For 24 short hours, it shall be as if only men existed (actually, quite a lot shorter than that, as I tend to sleep a lot).
Of course, in the spirit of a man going his own way, I wouldn't dare suggest that any other man do this, or judge him poorly should he do something else or ignore it altogether.
Perhaps I might even rename it 'International MGTOW Day'. If you keep a blog, and you think there's some merit in promoting the letters MGTOW to a wider audience, consider publishing a short post on an International MGTOW Day belonging completely to the men who support the idea, and no-one else.
Something that doesn't require the recognition of the UN or a government body.
Is it illegal yet to act so unilaterally?
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | Comments Off
Women’s Porn
Friday, September 5th, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
If this was only a case of women wanting to see themselves in authority, then I wouldn't have bothered remarking it. What is more significant is the grossly demeaning way in which the men are depicted and treated. The cop shows are the worst. Nearly every episode starts with the discovery of a female victim, and the perpetrator is soon discovered to be a man. Usually a sex offendor to boot. And a control-freak who is cruel to animals, and probably a right-wing homophobic fascist with a racist world-view. Not to mention an appalling dress-sense and an old-fashioned '50s attitude to women (God created an imperfect world around 1950, according to popular girl-power drama).
This modern-day redefining of the old-fashioned slime-ball has brought with it a parallel redefinition of the cop who takes things into her own hands. Dirty Harry is now a much dirtier Harriet. Any man who disrespects women - and that would appear to be most of us - is now ripe for the arrogant swagger of a 20 something police lieutenant, with bust bursting out of straining chemise, face freshly made-up and hair coiffed within the last 10 minutes. The air is thick with her venomous, inquisitorial pronouncements on the hapless male's motives, modus and general lack of worth to the world - and with each new season, the punk is feeling more stupidly lucky than the season before, and each new law-enforcement mistress is having her day made. TV men are getting quite the dealing to - pistol whippings, beatings and the odd killing to drive the point home. All of it, needless to say, carrying with it the obvious message that such violence towards men is fully justified.
It's not hard to form the opinion that modern women are lusting after absolute control over men, and are driving themselves into a frenzy at the prospect of doing to them whatever they like. There is a quality to it that reminds me of the pornographic imagery of women as creatures that men have traditionally lusted after; there is that same unmistakeable salivation at the prospect of a primal urge being given expression. Absent is any cerebral consideration of why this urge should be restrained - not by others, but by the lusting individual herself.
Allowing for the fact that we permit freedom of expression, it's only natural that genres of entertainment would evolve to serve all psychological cravings. Until recently, men's desire for the unconstrained sexual availabilty of women was the more overt - a parallel desire within women has never been previously so obvious. But we are seeing it now, emerging at precisely the time when women are feeling less fearful of any unfavourable consequence to giving vent to whatever it is they crave.
They crave control of our lives, just as we crave their reproductive capacity.
This is the yin and the yang of the male and the female, and what was once embodied in the institution of marriage - the exchange of a woman's child-bearing capability for a man's labour. The repugnance we feel at these images of women as our sneering overlords is probably akin to what many women experience when confronted with pornography. Each of us recognises our value being sold too cheaply, though most often the sentiment is instinctive rather than reasoned.
Ultimately, at the heart of every man, is the horror of having his labour taken from him by force. This is 'our rape'. If every women fears a rapist in every man, it is also true that every man fears the rapist in every woman.
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | View Comments
The Decline Continues
Friday, August 22nd, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
And Rule 413 is not restricted to prior criminal convictions or even arrests of the defendant. A mere accusation of a prior sexual offense would be admissible if the government can prove it occurred by a preponderance of the evidence (which means 51% likely). This is far less than guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. There is also no time limit as to required proximity of the prior bad acts to the charged criminal conduct upon which the trial is based.
What makes this posting timely is that a new law is being proposed here in New Zealand where accused rapists who plan to argue that sex with their victims was consensual may have to prove in court what measures they took to gain consent. In other words, they are guilty unless they can prove otherwise.
There's a common thread to all these new laws that reduce men's legal rights. It's the increasing ease with which women can use the justice system to secure for themselves men's wealth.
Traditionally, a woman got at a man's wealth by marrying one, giving birth to sons and inheriting from fathers.
Now that fathers are disappearing from family life and men are becoming more reluctant to marry, can it really be co-incidence that new laws are coming into play that allow women to make the most ridiculous of claims of any man and be assured that they will win in a courtroom? How long before an automatic guilty verdict for rape translates into financial compensation? Not long at all, if history is any guide. Every law that women have had passed in their favour - read DV, matrimonial property, no-fault divorce, automatic child custody, child support, sexual harassment, work-place discrimination - have all translated into huge wealth transfers from men to women. How very convenient that this should be occurring at exactly the same time as marriage is imploding as an institution.
It isn't apparent that this law would not apply retrospectively, so it's conceivable that it would not only require men to prove that they obtained consent for sex, but that for any charge of rape - not matter how long ago - the same onus of proof is required, or it's off to jail you go. Or not, I suspect, if you can reach an out-of-court financial settlement.
This means every woman you have ever had sex with is now a potential predator and could be supported by the courts in any claim she makes. All she has to do is make the complaint and you're toast. And I suspect running off to foreign lands will be of no assistance at all, unless that country has no extradition treaty with your homeland. The number of countries of this ilk are also decreasing every year. With the spread of communicating computer systems, there will be nowhere to hide.
If you think I'm being alarmist, think again. This is exactly what's happened with the child support system, where a man can be ordered to pay amounts on an ongoing basis that may have absolutely no correspondence with his capacity to pay, and doesn't require that the children he is being ordered to support are his or that he has any contact with them - a recent case here hasn't even established that the mother should demonstrate that the children she receives support for are actually alive.
Laws are now in place to extradite any man from another country if he is breach of these orders and to arrest him at international borders. None of this would have been thinkable a short while ago - it would have been considered such a gross violation of natural justice that no-one would have thought anyone would have tolerated it. But we have. Most don't even know that it's going on.
All of it has that stink of that fool of a man that ordered all the men on a sinking ship to stand to attention at the point of a gun, while all the women and children were loaded onto lifeboats.
Is our ship going down and no-one's saying anything except 'women and children first'?
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | View Comments
Growth of MGTOW
Wednesday, August 20th, 2008
By One Man's Kingdom [source]
A Google search on the same term today returns 41,200 results - an increase of 75% in only 6 months. If only my stocks had done so well.
I've been checking every week or so in the interim, and the growth has been steady over that period. I'd have to say that the climate has already altered since then, with writers like Stephen Baskerville, Steve Moxon and Kathleen Parker getting some serious attention. Comment counts on Glenn Sacks blog have gone astronomical, with some threads attracting over 600. Here in NZ, the incumbent Feminist government looks set to be trounced in the impending October/November election, with the likely conservative opposition party promising to end welfare to single mothers as soon as their youngest goes to school.
The ice is thawing.
Topics: One Man's Kingdom | View Comments
« Previous Entries