Rebuking Feminism
« Previous Entries Next Entries »Article Summary
- Men’s Night? Men Are Free and Drinks Are Half Off [2010-May-20]
- MRA Letter to my Countrymen [2010-May-5]
- Women’s Leaders Request Right To Desertion From Combat [2010-May-4]
- What We Want In A Woman [2010-May-4]
- Anatomy of Matriarchy & Gynocentric Consummation [2010-Apr-25]
- Woman I Extoll Our Sacred Bond [2010-Apr-22]
- Female Hegemony …. Male Cultural Expressions [2010-Apr-16]
- Male Studies Conference Symposium WAS A SUCCESS! [2010-Apr-11]
- Men IT’S ALL YOUR FAULT!…..ALL OF IT! [2010-Apr-8]
- My Body Her Choice……Her Body Her Choice…..A Child’s Body Her Choice [2010-Apr-6]
- « Previous Articles
Men’s Night? Men Are Free and Drinks Are Half Off
Thursday, May 20th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
Apparently ladies night price schemes are implemented to make a profit. The thought is that since women are inherently valuable and inherently worthy of mating and reproducing, simply by having their presence increases the amount of males who attend.
I am not sure why there have not been class action law suits against businesses who discriminate by gender to make a profit. How does it work if one were to purchase a drink for a female on ladies night? Do you have to specify that the drink is for a female in order to get it at half price or do men pay full price for the privilege to make a drink gift offering present to women?
How is it that women are treated with economic privilege when they are our competition for resources by way of economic & political laws and policy? Why do women expect to be equal yet still feel inherently deserving of being provided for by society and from men?
Why is it ok to implement a business policy that discriminates against men for the sake of making profit yet to allegedly do so to women is against the law? In fact, it is considered so wrongful that Affirmative Action, Title IX and Gender based hiring\ promotion freezes are placed upon men so that women may once again be first, ladies first. Was there ever any policy that discriminated against women to begin with that would warrant discriminatory policies against men?
What is the real reason males are heavily represented in the top ranks of organizations? Is it because men are more driven to compete? Is it because men are more driven to acquire resources? Why would men be more driven toward these things? Does having such things make men more worthy of a female being that males carry no inherent value as a mate and therefore must earn it and furthermore present these earnings as offerings to females? Is this "male privilege" women speak of something men are given or something men earn? Is the male condition in fact even a privilege or choice? Is it ok if we should expect women earn the privileges given to them as well?
Is it just me or is the whole thing a lie and a farce? Is it just me or have women tricked us? Is the truth really that women were never unequal to men but actually more valued and treated better than men all along? Is it just me or has their welfare always been put before and above that of men? Is it just me or is it really that women are not only "equal" to men but in fact hold more privileges and choices in life and society than men do..both in public and private life???
I am not quite sure why so much deference is given to women above men. Why are women always put first? Why do women make sure that they are put first in the event of an emergency? How is it that they do not see men as important and valuable as themselves? Are men responsible for the welfare of women? Do women have any responsibilities toward and for men? Is there any instance in which women defer to men? Is there an instance that women are expected to put men first? Do women have any social obligations toward men and our welfare as men have for women? Can someone explain to me why women are put first above men?
Are women more valuable than men? Are they more important, more lovable, more deserving? Why are women given such privileges and deferred to over men both socially, politically and economically?
Question.... all things apparently being equal, does it make sense to treat men unequally in these realms of public and private life, if so, why? Question....should the welfare of women come first, above and before that of men and if so, why?.........
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
MRA Letter to my Countrymen
Wednesday, May 5th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
TO UNIVERSE: THANK YOU SO MUCH for providing historical documents of the Men’s and Father’s Rights Movement and the MRA. Such information is crucial to the intellectual formulation and even affirmation of our current state of affliction.
From here it is imperative to coalesce into a political force with secular representation for our gender at the Federal level as women now have.. Once we get there we shall decide whether to dismantle The Council On Women and Girls or create a Council On Men and Boys…
Personally sir, I do not think our founding fathers of my dear Republic believed that we should have secular representation within government for gender, race, or religion and as such I am for dismantling the female apparatus of secular laws and representation post haste and by bearing arms if need be.
“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” — Thomas Jefferson
Quite frankly I am viscerally aware that my Republic and my country beckon our call. Be assured that I love my countrywoman dearly and wish her no harm but that we as men must restore our Constitutional Republic..
I have a very simple request and that is that we remember what Freedom, Liberty, Independence, Justice and equal representation under law actually means.
Gentlemen and ladies if you will, please know that our greatest issues stem from the overreach of our government and the associated parasites such as feminism that feast upon our Liberty.
I very honestly tell you that I think something is terribly wrong with our Republic and the things for which it currently stands. I do think we should mobilize in peaceful assembly with great haste if we are to save it. I only dare say to take arms but our founders left that as a last option……Under no circumstances should the American people surrender our arms to Government.
The form of government secured by the Declaration of Independence, the American Revolution, and the Constitution is unique in history and reflects the strongly held beliefs of the American Revolutionaries.
At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 18, 1787, a Mrs. Powel anxiously awaited the results, and as Benjamin Franklin emerged from the long task now finished, asked him directly: “Well Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” “A Republic….. if you can keep it” responded Franklin.
------------
From the comments section:
Joab said...
"This kind of thing will get your name in an FBI file. If they come for you sooner rather than later, it was nice knowing you! :-)"
I am an American and if my country, my government decides to attack me then I will defend myself. I am not afraid of a government who you believe might label me as a traitor or domestic terrorist as this sir would make it no longer my government.
To infringe upon my personal liberties as you say or to attack my person or home for such reasons as you listed would be an act of war...
I will not be tolerant or apathetic to the plight of my country or it's future security.
If you have not noticed, our country, our Republic is in danger sir...
"Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society"
Aristotle
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
President Thomas Jefferson
"Currently 90% of fathers loose their children in divorce. Visitation of 4 days a month is the norm. Men have the god given right to be a father. Fatherhood is the natural right of any man, a right that can not be infringed. Men have the right to their own bodies and the fruits of its labors"
"The income gap between the rich and the rest of the US population has become so wide, and is growing so fast, that it might eventually threaten the stability of democratic capitalism itself."
Alan Greenspan, US Federal Reserve Chairman 1987-2006
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or the people"
10th Amendment United States Constitution
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
President Thomas Jefferson
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
President Thomas Jefferson
"Our Founding Fathers knew the importance of the separation of church and state but failed to enact the need for separation of corporation from state and for that matter race and gender"
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
President Thomas Jefferson
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed."
U.S. President Abraham Lincoln
"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot"
Mark Twain
On Bankers and business elite and the dawn of the "New Deal":
"Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of the public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men...The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilization" Throughout the nation, men and women, forgotten in the political philosophy of Government, look to us here for guidance and for more equitable opportunity to share in the national wealth. I pledge myself to a new deal for the American people. This is more than a political campaign. It is a call to arms!"
President Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Are you willing to defend this country and give your life to defend what we have become? This is a natural instinct of any man who identifies personally with his country and who's country and culture meets his needs, values and ideals. It becomes a man who inspires his country to meet his. Do you identify with our country? Do you love what we have become?"
"Do not be fooled by those who see you as just another consumer in a market of undifferentiated possibilities, where choice itself becomes the god, novelty usurps beauty, and subjective experience displaces truth."
POPE Benedict XVI
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
Benjamin Franklin
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty."
President Thomas Jefferson
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
President James Madison
"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist."
Winston Churchill
"Feminism has driven men, women and family apart, destroyed economic principals of free market, incentive for individual free enterprise and in effort to create classlessness and "equality" have created women as a separate class. A systemically created elevated class structure by gender,race or religion with separate civil liberties is a violation of our founding principals as a nation. A Cabinet post created in the highest element of government for the benefit of one gender alone, laws and representation for one gender alone or any race or religion alone will divide and destroy my nation! Such division of class in such respects is the hallmark of fascism in actual definition and in historical practice."
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them"
President Thomas Jefferson
"No one can make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little."
Edmund Burke
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat."
President Theodore Roosevelt
Sir, I am an American. I am not a traitor.. This is my country and the country of my people. This is our government of the people, by the people and for the people. We have the right to dismantle our government and to do so by taking arms and shedding blood if necessary. This is our right as a free people, it is the right our fathers gave to us as men and it is men alone they entrusted to uphold it and for very good reason. This is not simply a right of our people, it is a moral obligation.
"What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms"
-President Thomas Jefferson
"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember, or overthrow it"
-President Abraham Lincoln
"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence. It is force, and like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
-President George Washington
Beware the growth of Government, as it is by it's very nature, force, a fearful master, it is tyranny. Do not be afraid my countryman, do not fear our government, the government should fear our people.
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." -Benito Mussolini
A graph of the Distribution of Wealth by globalization and the death of the American Middle class can be seen HERE
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
Women’s Leaders Request Right To Desertion From Combat
Tuesday, May 4th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
+of+ScreenShot001.bmp){kind=link}
This is not our fathers military!
I have no doubt that Women’s Party leaders will not back down on this issue. Just as they did with divorce law, child custody law, “women first” laws like Title IX and Affirmative Action, mandated government contracts to women owned businesses, the diversion of the Stimulus Package to women, women support alimony, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc etc. YOU NAME IT…! I’ve come to learn that women have an innate sense of entitlement.
Women and their leaders WILL succeed in their demands to “control their own bodies”. We must remember, women’s bodies and the fruits of its labor are theirs and theirs alone. Women have no obligation of duty and sacrifice. They don’t understand what being a soldier and service to country means. Duty, Honor, Valor, Sacrifice and Bravery don’t seem to be attributable to females.
Men’s bodies are for service of women and from the age of 18 on, for the service of country. Women have no obligation or duty to men but “choices”. Women have no obligation or duty to country……
Men’s children are owned by women as well.
It’s just they way it is. There is no equivalent for women as they have no responsibilities but “choices”. There is no equivalent word for women to “man-up”.
It is only expected that women will be given leeway when it comes to the crimes of desertion and cowardice as both of these things are simply more expected from women.
Women’s Party leaders will ensure that females have all the rights without responsibility, honor or accountability. They already have such in the rest of society, I don’t see how the military expects to end up much different.
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
What We Want In A Woman
Tuesday, May 4th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
"I’d like to invite readers to comment on some of the things that they actually do like about women. What are those things that can make you fall for a girl? What sets her apart from the others?"
I'd like to share my answer with you here....
Wow, where to start. I’ve always admired a quality in women that could be described as grace. To me female grace would imply a woman who is not selfish and will forfeit the spoils of good graces from men in the name of the higher ideal of reciprocal obligation, truth, respect, honor and responsibility. She would exhibit a tepid trepidation toward the idea of receiving excesses to suit her selfish and self centered desires.
A woman who is capable of nurturing, selflessness, empathy and who is giving only "opens up the door for me" to bestow my honor upon her. Someone who likes children, animals and nature.. I do think that women who are not spoiled by their youth, beauty and inherent attraction to men for the simple fact that she exists is very hard to come by. I do find that this is even more difficult to find a woman with grace if she is physically beautiful.
I also want qualities of grace that I could only describe as motherly qualities.
I want a woman who understands that she does not have ownership over children as if they were property and values the role of a father in the life of children.
I want someone who values the obligations and role of husband and father and will not exploit my honor and trust by taking my beloved child away from me and forcing me to financially support her and what she sees as “her” child by reducing me to the role of “Isolated Resource Producing Male” . It is simply the fact that women have the right to do the above by law that I can not bestow my honor upon one in marriage. It is because they have ownership of children that I am unwilling and unable to secure the honor of being a father.
I want a woman who believes that it should not be equality (sameness to men), independence (mutual or exploitative dis-need) , freedom and liberation (mutual dis-need) that reigns but difference, dependence, bondage and servitude that consecrates us and makes sacred our married bond.
I want a woman who will not abandon her family as so many do in much greater proportion than do men, especially if there are children involved. I want a woman that understands that her “choices” should not be enabled by male liabilities.
I simply want a woman who is not selfish and self centered as so many have become now in character and by law. I want a woman who respects sexuality and could only wish that sex did not play such a public and promiscuous role in her interactions with men in society and as now a part of her public identity. In essence someone who does not believe that females should be “sex objects”.
To me however all women are presumptively sexually available and this changes everything. It changes how I view and interact with women in general and how they view and interact with me. Though I do not pursue women for sex anymore I find that the modern woman’s identity of presumptive sexual availability affects virtually every aspect of even the most innocent, innocuous and benign interaction. I simply wish that if I were to interact with a woman at a bar or party that she was not a “sex object”. To me, all women are now sex objects.
She knows that by definition of social culture and morays that sex is on the table and as such a potential motive for my every action and potential motive for her action. It is now an inseparable part of our public relationship. I used to enjoy this quite a bit but I find myself wanting something more fulfilling, and now more than ever simply wish it were not this way. Perhaps it is something within females that will temper and recede with age. As for now I will have to maneuver around her inherent sense of value, an acute narcissism that seems to afflict the most physically desirable of females the most.
This is something of which men who are successful with women or those who care to bother pursuing her understand quite well. They promptly set about the laborious process of negating her inherent value and sense of self. It is the case that women are inherently desired, valued and worthy of men. No one speaks of the female ego so I will do so here and now. So for those who do not know, the inherent worthiness of her sex is where it comes from and this is the basis for which her ego is comprised.
Upon the most momentary of interactions I find myself repulsed by this commonality which I've found to be present in many modern, even remotely desirable woman. I wish it were removed and female grace, a type of humility and refinement would take its place. To me anyway, this is a virtually ubiquitous affliction of what could and would ordinarily be the most eligible of young, beautiful and fertile women in our culture.
I find it most disturbing that I do not honor what has become of her. I don't think women are inherently like this but rather it is something that most certainly is cultivated by American culture and values. For those of you who are students of Game, game on. As for me, a dignified conversation will suffice and a long slow process of courtship is ideal. Sexing women is something I am now indifferent to. I no longer engage the hook-up culture and for quite some time have taken respite from it. Perhaps such is the plight placed upon us by the American Cultural Revolution & "female sexual liberation" as they call it. Such is now our common struggle. Many women will ride this train until the dwindling twilight of their most fertile years...........
I also want a woman that is physically beautiful but again I must say that such an asset, in our culture anyway, often predicates a diametric opposition to the qualities for which to me, make for a truly wonderful, beautiful, endearing and desirable woman. One who could indeed hold the most sacred position to me in my family, a wife and mother.
This post was inspired by the-spearhead.com you can continue the conversation HERE
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
Anatomy of Matriarchy & Gynocentric Consummation
Sunday, April 25th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
Absolutely!
–”Traditional masculinity (specifically the protective male instinct) is the reason for the rise of female supremacy”
Absolutely,..and precisely because females are now able to and indeed seek to legislate and personify the male within government. I believe instinctually males tend to avoid competition and conflict with females and are actually quite responsive to female demands, screams and otherwise female demands or perceived need for more protection and provision. I do believe that males are predisposed to look after female general safety and well being. As you have noticed deference to females has become legislated by law. This is inevitably what happens to the political and social system when females are given power over it. They actually commandeer the social fabric and legislative policies to serve their own ends. Female authority and power is not protective or provisionary to males as male power and authority is to females.
It is no mistake that the Stimulus Package was devoted to females upon the request of Women's Party Feminists for protection and provision though 80% of all jobs lost have been to men.
Essentially and unfortunately our essential natures are personified within the political system and further reinforced by the dominate female 54-56% majority vote.
Through this model provision to females becomes dually compounded. The system essentially becomes matrifocal, gynocentric and Matriarchal.
Males will actually turn on other males and the well being of males as a group to accommodate the needs of females. I believe this is why females as a group vote overwhelmingly for male candidates. The system very quickly becomes matrifocal and begins to cannibalize itself of male enfranchisement. Political leaders are rewarded with power for serving the dominate female voting block.
See: Workhorses of the Matriarchy
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years." -Alexander Tytler (attributed)
Our Founding Fathers hated Democracy! They referred to it as the "tyranny of the majority" They believed, they hoped that the foundational laws of our Republic could save us.
This is why Matriarchal civilizations do not and can not progress beyond the communal level. In larger social constructs the system actually cannibalizes itself of it's own means of production and the associated enfranchisement and productive incentive of males. Females actually seek to create and personify the male within government,a government husband if you will.
In terms of mate selection males are a class divided especially in relation to the government husband. When these forces are acted upon and introduced systemically and politically the results can be and have been disastrous for males. Call it chivalry turned against itself, chivalry institutionalized and legislated, the best aspects of males used against us as a group by the government and reinforced by the female voting block. This is in fact the greatest weapon of feminism.
Female authority is not protective or provisional like male authority is. When female gynocentrism becomes systemic as it has, civilizational decline quickly follows, historically it always has. I am not so sure our Republic can recover from this…. But we have the duty to understand what is happening in the hopes of correcting it….
Female power, being gynocentric in nature advocates for the consummation of resources around the well being of females and females alone. Women as a political group will not stop this, it is simply female nature. Systemically speaking female authority and power consumes the system of itself.
”The idea of men gathering in groups to discuss their problems as a gender flies directly in the face of traditional masculinity.”
Absolutely, Males will not do this as we are in competition to distinguish our own value in external utility from other males. We will not advocate to help other males UNLESS we realize what I'm trying to outline here which is that MALES AS A GROUP are being systematically and politically disenfranchised. UNLESS, males are able to respond to this and organize as a group for our own wellbeing and enfranchisement the Matriarchal system will continue to grow.
Unless this is achieved it will be business as usual i.e. males particularly those in power will actually turn on other males to accommodate the needs of females especially when females have the dominate power in the political system. Again, the system turns matrifocal very quickly. The males who serve the needs of females the most are voted into power. In terms of mate selection males are a class divided. In terms of the well being of males Vs institutionalized Government Husbandry \ Chivalry \ Matriarchy we can not compete. The goal essentially is to nullify the necessity of husband and father all together both at the personal level in family and divorce law and at the political level with Federal law.
This agenda is in fact what women meant when they said “The Personal Is Political”
The idea is to systematically direct the resource support construct ordinarily provided through marriage to themselves through the political process, from family law to the Federal level. This is done by two primary methods, forced resource provision by Isolated Resource Producing Males after no-fault divorce at the family level and through Government Husbandry.
In terms of political power males can not compete with the homogeneous and gynocentric tendencies of female nature and the related political disposition of it's voting block. Again, we must remember that females are programed to look after themselves while males are a means to an end for herself and “her” offspring. When you observe the social systems that females build, when you observe their behavior within these institutions this becomes very clear.
The female carries inherent value and does not seek to be worthy of the well being of males, she is in fact inherently worthy. In essence, her biological value can not become systemic, institutionalized transferable and stolen from her in the political process or even to the level of family law as she can do to males. Male value after all is heavily weighted in "external utility"
Male enfranchisement and voting participation has been on the decline ever since….
This is the natural result of Matriarchy and female institutional power. Male voting rates have declined sharply since mid-1960s i.e. the beginning of the Matriarchal social and political construct (feminism). Between the 1964 and 2000 Presidential elections the male voting rate declined from 72 to 53 percent.
All male fitness and well being indicators are in a drastic decline.
GRAPHS: MALE HEALTH INDICATORS
-workforce participation
-voter participation
-suicide rates
-incarceration rates
-college attendance, educational attainment and admittance policy
-educational attainment graph #2
+of+ScreenShot005.bmp){kind=link}
-marriage rates
-divorce rates annotated* for cohabitation
-general health & health care & life expectancy
If history is any lesson, I do not think it will be much longer before a patriarchal civilization finishes us off….. this is the way it has always been….
Of further note it is important to recognize that Matriarchy goes hand in hand with polyandry. Females are just as adamant in regard to increasing their genetic fitness and diversity, she will in fact move from male to male if the resource support construct is available. This is what women have sought and accomplished in their changes to family and marriage law and increasingly are doing so with their representation at the Federal level. Such is the central course of action female political and social power has taken and will continue to take. Such is the course of the female biological imperative and thus its representative political ethos. It is the end goal and central modus operandi of feminism. Such propensities are increasingly enforced through such organizations as N.O.W., The Feminist Majority and other large feminist organizations. This is done so increasingly through the Federal Council On Women and Girls as well.
Note*
Though all aspects of male health and well being are in decline there is no Council On Men and Boys nor a Federal Office On Men's Health while women now have 7 the last time I checked. Though it is thought since it is males who are our public servants that males are adequately represented as a socio-political class but this is not the case for the reasons I've outlined above. Quite frankly our founders never intended to have separate and unequal representation and laws within government by gender, race or religion.
The solution would be to remove representation by gender within government altogether or add representation for the male gender. The end goal should be to somehow restore rights, advocacy, representation and enfranchisement of men, boys, husbands and fathers in society, family, divorce law and in governmental policy.
The above blog post was inspired by conversations had at The-Spearhead.Com and Mensnewsdaily.Com
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
Woman I Extoll Our Sacred Bond
Thursday, April 22nd, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
Morality extends from a type of existential understanding, philosophy and both from complex reasoning, it in fact elucidates the not seen, the other half, the complete picture. Confucius taught that the opposites make the whole, they make the equal, the eternal. Other men of great intelligence and standing have understood this as well...
"Man and woman have each of them qualities and tempers in which the other is deficient and which in union contribute to the common felicity. Single and separate, they are not the complete human being; they are like the odd halves of scissors; they cannot answer the end of their formation." -=Benjamin Franklin=-
Morality allows us to grasp the very context of truth. In many ways only from a moral context can one understand truth. From truth, from knowing the eternal come all things good.
"Beauty is truth, truth beauty, that is all ye know on earth, and all ye need to know."
-John Keats
Love is truth and truth is beauty, this is all one needs to know.
Men are beginning to fight to restore our sacred bond with you, a bond that has been sullied, desecrated, demeaned, profited off of, humiliated and exploited. You have made chivalry toward women a for profit industry and done incredible harm to men, boys, husbands, fathers and the family itself in the process.
Woman it is you and your beliefs. Woman it is your actions, your Women's Feminist leaders who are killing something within men.You seek to kill a sense of respect, duty and honor toward women and family, the chivalry you are killing in him, the father and husband in him.
I ask you what is woman to men if she is not honorable? What is woman if her station and social identity is not wife and mother?
What is woman when she becomes men's liability and
responsibility outside of the married bounds of reciprocal
obligation, duty and commitment?
What is she when she is our competition socially, politically and economically?
Beware your Feminist Leaders Women, watch closely what they are doing.....
Evil always presents itself as good. True evil is always the
exact opposite of what it purports itself to be and this is how
it hides. It is said that the greatest trick evil or (the Devil if you prefer) ever pulled was convincing the world that it didn't exist. Our difference, dependence, bondage and servitude have come to us as equality (sameness), independence, freedom and liberation.
Woman you have been deceived so that such things come through you and by you upon men. You have forsaken his body and the fruits of its labor. You have desecrated our sacred bond...
You have been lied to, we are mutually yoked yet not equals, we are different and not the same.
You are not "independent" from him but dependent and he to you.
You are not free but bonded, and he to you,
You are not "liberated" but in servitude and he to you.....
The powers that be have deceived you. They seek to destroy us. I realize now that the story of Adam and Eve is metaphorical. Woman you have been offered the apple once again. Do not partake, do not cast him asunder from you.
The most treacherous of evil has always come to man through woman and the most evil of forces knows this and uses you against men to rule us both........Woman, the future of our Republic is at stake.
"Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included." -Karl Marx
"Destroy the family, you destroy the country." -Vladimir Lenin
-------------------
From the comments section:
"What is woman if her station and social identity is not wife and mother?"
An adult with dreams and ambitions that don't revolve around someone else?
Response: Family is not something for you then. For you, it is the self you love.
For you it is equality (sameness to men), independence, freedom and liberation (mutual dis-need) that reigns.
I can only tell you that if women as a class are not a part of the family of men then you are my competition socially, politically and economically. You are "equal" and the same and will be treated no different than my competition. You are independent and deserve nothing from men. You are free and I will be free from you. You are liberated and so men shall liberate ourselves from you. You, as a separate socio-political and socio-economic class are my opposition. I will compete against you for my own wellbeing.
This also makes you and "your" children a liability to me and something that I as an "equally" "independent" and "liberated" man refuse to support. In this model women and "their" children should be left to their own devices, men should have no honor or obligation to you as individual women and as a separate class. Men as not a part of your family owe you nothing. Men as a separate socio-economic class owe nothing to you. If you are not a member of the family of men then you are my competition and in terms of our ongoing fight for representation under law to acquire the ends of competitive advantage you are my enemy.
Woman I implore you to understand that I am a student of science and history. In regard to the below my countrywoman, I ask you to recognize that this is the end of a civilization and to the Republic unless we do something about it.
Maam, with all due respect, the mating dynamic has taken a drastic deviation and has done so very quickly. Do not be alarmed by the development of Male Studies. We are trying to ascertain the damage and formulate a response the the situation. We are doing so particularly in regard to finding out and defining what our relationship to women actually is and how to deal with the death of fatherhood, marriage and being a husband.
In discussion among men at the moment for which you might find interesting is the change in our mating strategy from long term commitment based structure to a short term strategy and hook ups.
Of particular interest is the development of a profound change in male behavior patterns known as PUA and GAME. The black community is also of particular interest as primary exacerbating factors to this dynamic are much greater and prevalent in the black community and thus the mating strategy of black males. I believe the black community now has a 70% single woman birth rate.
The specific relation to the development of the welfare state and it's associated resource support construct for females is of particular interest. At the moment, it appears that the variables proportionally correspond. You will notice on the graph above the sudden down tick of single mother birth rates in 1993 and beyond, this was when one element of the resource support construct given to females i.e. welfare was reformed. Though the level of single mother births is still rising, elemental changes in how women are supported by government reduced the momentum of this rise.
Also of significant importance is the advent of the "Isolated Resource Producing Male" as a resource support construct for the female, particularly in cases of no-fault and the associated conditions placed upon the male by changes in family law introduced and successfully implemented by feminists. The combination of the two resource support constructs for females were implemented simultaneously in the 1960's and 70's. The idea was to support females financially from the public treasury while also making male financial support unconditionally transferable to females through no-fault laws. The results of pseudo-independence for females has come at a great cost and at the civil and essential liberties of men, their bodies and the fruits of their labor.
I do apologize for the poor quality of the graph but it serves it's purpose for graphical representation of the two corresponding variables in question.
There are many questions that need to be answered. Men are starting to ask ourselves what our place is in relation to women and "her" children.... In short the genders are collectively divorcing and men are seeking to find our place and rights in this new order. Equal representation under law and the right to our own bodies and the fruits of its labor are paramount in establishing Men's Liberation. Meaningful contact with our children is also paramount.
However, increasingly I believe it will be in men's best interest to secede from our sacred bond, our union, to in fact become independent and liberated as women seek to become from men. To withdraw from responsibility, obligation and liabilities female dependency and choices without equal reciprocation and liabilities toward men has brought us. This will end in one of two ways, men as part of the family and the lives of our children or men as not.
The ramifications of having separate socio-political and socio-economic interests between men and women has and will continue to place men and women in diametric opposition and competition with each other in the social, political and economic sphere. We are, and will continue to have, our own separate class interests in all realms. Men are quite aware of "women first" provisions and female only laws, as well as gynocentric resource distribution in government. We are aware that nothing has changed for us and are now seeking the change you desire or to solve the problem.
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
Female Hegemony …. Male Cultural Expressions
Friday, April 16th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
Politicians know and it is the case that the female vote is the most swayable but in general women will side with who provides for them the most. Historically, shortly after women began voting they have voted almost entirely Democratic. Women survive by eliciting resource provision and protection from others both privately, by ensnaring a male in the now one sided exchange of marriage and communally through government husbandry or outside marriage with forced male resource provision of an "Isolated Resource Producing Male"
I believe that NO OTHER CLASS OF HUMAN BEING BESIDES CHILDREN could ever be provided such unequal representation under law in so many realms and facets of day to day society and under the guise of equality. None other than woman could have managed to divert the Stimulus Package to themselves during one of the most dire Recessions this country has seen since the Great Depression..Not to mention one in which 80+ percent of all jobs lost are to men in this Mancession. None other than woman could do this, I assure you of that!
Anyway, they don’t break from the herd to distinguish their status or by pushing the limits of their external utility and capability, they don't seem as driven to take risks and distinguish themselves from the group, they simply don’t have to, females, as it is, are inherently valuable, why expend effort, energy and risk where one does not have to i.e. where there is no pressure sexually selectively speaking or not. Females are in fact the constant XX while the male XY is the variable subject to selection and change. As we know, males are represented at the top and bottom of the bell curve, which goes to illustrate the heavy selective pressure upon the male.
MORE:Helena Cronin: Philosopher, London School of Economics; director and founder Darwin@LSE; author, The Ant and the Peacock explains the gender dimorphisms above and those mentioned that caused the President of Harvard University to lose his job and subsequent social execution by Women's Feminists
You will notice that a primary element of feminism involves attacking and legislating against men at both the top and bottom of the dimorphic curve. Essentially women have a deep disgust toward and revile the beta males below the "Glass Floor" and seek to legislate heavily against them while simultaneously looking above the "Glass Ceiling" in contempt of the men at the top of the curve, the alphas as well, again seeking to heavily legislate against them.
Remember, when feminist women or the Women's Party speak of men, they are usually referring to some aspect of the top or bottom of the curve. When you hear about feminist legislation or hear their conjecture in the future, think of and identify which side of the dimorphic curve it is referring to or targeted against.
Note* This may be different from who is actually affected by it. Usually however it is the males within the curve, the vast majority of men, your average Joe that is affected most adversely.
------
cont....
There is not nearly as much sexually selective pressure upon the female. Heavy selective pressure is placed upon the male and carried through the Y chromosome. Again, the Y is the variable. XX Female is the base blueprint. The female has cross redundant backup mechanisms that repair damage to this. So pop Women's Feminists can stop SAYING MEN ARE GOING EXTINCT...This has shown your true character.
Likewise she is clustered around the center, the mean average and this is representative in her nature. She remains in the center of gender dimorphic differences from the standard deviation of variance i.e. the bell curve, is agreeable, socially attuned, communal, intuitively perceptive of her relational state to others and the acute emotional and relational disposition of those around her, this is how the female survives, it is her nature.
She is not likely to take risks of social rejection by distinguishing herself as much as males. The assertion of new and great ideas and concepts, as history has shown, are often times very risky endeavors socially speaking. Contrastingly to males it seems that it is the female hegemonic representation in the clustered center, her communal nature, her socialist tendencies, that gives her social influence and power. A tendency however which leads to the lack of female representation as comedians and in other such "stand alone" social status activities. She is homogeneous in nature, she, in general, is less likely to risk great failure or great success (something that just prior to predicating decided action, usually corresponds to the "size" or proportion of the risk the person themselves quantifies in their head.
Men by nature have a different threshold of quantification of sizable risk. Male risk taking is representative at the extremes, we are driven to magnificent display behavior, strive for feats and cultural expressions that make us of better "external utility" than the next man or otherwise displays our intelligence or utility, we are in fact the purveyors of and actors of romance and romantic expression, song, poetry, stand up comedy and magicians. We are indeed represented at the extremes of variance from which to choose.
Male are much more likely to be represented at the extremes of specific abilities as well, we are more likely to be specialists or abnormally good at a specific trait. We are also represented at the other end of the spectrum, we are, also the majority of the mentally retarded, physically deformed, least intelligent portion of the population as well. I believe that males are represented at the extremes of cultural expression for this very reason i.e. because of the unique place the male holds of being the primary or "more selected for variable" XY. We males sure are characters : ) Human male display behavior is really a treat to see and is a vital element of culture and construct of any great civilization.
I do think that with rescinding and dwindling prospects of male production incentive and general enfranchisement as part of the family and in society, male display behavior i.e. an intrinsic element of culture dies along with it. To me it is certainly an indicator of civilizational decline.
The differences between the two sexes goes to illustrate the importance of male “external utility” (as our value as a mate is heavily weighted in such) and the NECESSITY of having a strong critical mass of well enfranchised males, particularly in terms of incentive prospects to produce for his enfranchisement and the associated opportunity for mating and paternal investment..
Males, in order to thrive require a competitive, and often if not entirely hierarchical competitive echelon, males need to be enfranchised in an environment with equal opportunity for competitive advantage. I would like to mention that just such a construct has been removed from our schools and education system. Competitive and resource reward based learning models have been mostly and entirely replaced with cooperative learning models. By legislative and sanctioned handicapping, male disempowerment from this competitive advantage echelon is increasingly becoming the case in the public sphere of general society and in business. Increasingly the only place males will find that we can compete fairly is in sports and video games.
Males are increasingly marginalized in Western Society and thus this is another aspect of what can only be described as the Male Eunuch or termed the feminization and ostracization of the modern man from a place in the family, society, politically, judicially, educationally and even in his personal health.
I find it particularly interesting that two words have entered the American Lexicon in the last several years that I can say with utter certainty did not exist prior, "mangina" and "metrosexual". I believe that these additions to, what is at the moment, the growing list of emasculating lexicon is reflective of the disenfranchisement of males in society, the family and culture.
As male value is heavily weighted in "external utility" and precisely because of this fact, words of feminization and emasculation are not intended to belittle or make less of the female, rather, they are in a very real sense, intended to be the very antithetical definition of essential masculinity, what is and what will increasingly become, "THE MALE EUNUCH"
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
Male Studies Conference Symposium WAS A SUCCESS!
Sunday, April 11th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
This is just the beginning formation of the ideological and intellectual core infrastructure to establishing the rights of men, boys fathers and husbands. It is in fact the beginning of the establishment and representation of males as a separate socio-political class.
As women have intended and stated it is now apparent that "the personal is political" and indeed it now is. From the policies and actions of women it is clear to me and many others that we must form ranks and engage women politically, socially and economically if we are to compete and negotiate with them for our common and disparate interests.
It is my hope that men and boys will soon gain representation for our gender at the Federal level as women have. Again, women stated and embraced the mantra "the personal is political". As men we have no choice now but to take our politics to the personal level in regard to women.
Male studies will hold its first conference at the New York Academy of Medicine on Oct. 1 and 2, The foundation will launch Male Studies (not to be confused with the feminist "men's studies") and an Interdisciplinary Journal next year.
The entire symposium was recorded on video which I will post here or provide access to as soon as it is available!
CONGRATULATIONS MEN, BOYS, HUSBANDS AND FATHERS...THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING! WE HAVE A LONG STRUGGLE AHEAD OF US BUT ONE WE MUST FACE, ONE WE MUST ENDURE AND SUCCEED AT!
Dr. Edward Stephens, chairman of the newly launched Foundation for Male Studies, which aims to raise US$2-million or more to endow a chair for the discipline at a major university. The goal is the creation of a new academic discipline that will be instituted in every university in the country as women's studies now is. It is a place where males will have a voice and even advocacy! MAKE YOUR DONATION TODAY!
WE CAN DO IT!
YOU MAY JOIN THE MALE STUDIES FACEBOOK COMMUNITY HERE
http://www.malestudies.org/
PARENT INITIATIVE SITE: YOU MAY DONATE HERE: http://onstep.org/
Small step for men
'Male studies' the answer to overcoming 'lace curtain,' scholars say
THE FEMINIST BLOGOSPHERE HAS LITERALLY LIT UP OVER THIS DEVELOPMENT.. FOR SOME REASON I HAD A FEELING IT WOULD LEAD TO LITERAL SCREAMING AND SHRILLS FROM FEMINISTS. I WAS RIGHT, THEY ARE VERY ANGRY BY THIS!
Here: Academics Continue The Advocation for the NEED of Male Studies...V.S. Men's Studies who's leadership cuts off their own penises!
SOMEWHAT MORE REASONABLE DISCUSSION IS TAKING PLACE HERE.
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
Men IT’S ALL YOUR FAULT!…..ALL OF IT!
Thursday, April 8th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
THANK YOU: Campus Feminist Alliance
+of+ScreenShot008.jpg)
WOW, Thanks for the info ladies.
I had no idea men were responsible for:
Sexism
Rape
Sexual Abuse
Domestic Violence
Incest
Gay Bashing
Torture
War
We will get right on it ladies. We'll fix it all right up for ya.
Men, in case you didn't get the message you are responsible for all bad things and evil in the world.
Lets make a poster! We shall make this poster VERY LARGE, WEATHER PROOF, and hung with steel cable. It shall be a permanent poster, a permanent statement on campus for all women to see as they enter campus every day!
"WOMEN YOU CAN STOP"
-Sexism
-sexual extortion
-sexual abuse
-prostitution
-financial extortion
-domestic violence
-paternity fraud
-child abuse
-child murder
-parental alienation
-heterosexual bashing
-"women first" college admission polices like Title IX and Affirmative Action
-divorce
-fatherless children
-war.... by obtaining your own territory and resources AND GOING TO YOUR OWN CORNER OF THE PLANET WHERE I'M SURE THERE WILL BE RAINBOWS, BUTTERFLYS AND BIRDS SINGING ON YOUR SHOULDER FOR EVER AND EVER.
I'll tell you what, we will even send some men over to clear the area, gather and cut the lumbar, hovel down in filthy death trap holes and mine the earth for the concrete, aggregate and iron ore for the rebar, build a damn, divert the water to you, mine a years worth of coal, oil, plutonium and build a power plant for you....ALL FOR YOU, just so you can leave us alone! Who knows we may mine some diamonds for you while we're down there...to commit to you..no no no so you will leave us alone. Men are the only ones who lose and have responsibilities when women break commitments to us, you should know that....
Then we can finally have some peace. We can finally stop competing with each other for the privilege to do all these things for you. I blame YOU for the male condition. It is YOU who makes men do this to each other. YOU are the cause of our pain and suffering. Women, tell me you know this is true. How does that feel? Shall I make a poster? How dare you, you don't know what pain and suffering is! How dare you be so selfish and self centered. YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFINE THE MALE CONDITION AS YOU, WOMEN ARE THE CAUSE OF IT! YOU ARE THE CAUSE OF THE HATED "PATRIARCHY" OF WHICH YOU SPEAK. IT IS YOU THAT DRIVES MEN TO THIS! SHALL WE MAKE A POSTER!!!
IT IS YOU WHO HAS DONE THIS TO HIM. WOMAN \ FEMALE, YOU ARE THE CAUSE OF ALL OF THIS! SHALL I MAKE A POSTER TO SHAME YOU WITH AS YOU HAVE DONE TO MEN??? YOU KNOW? NO YOU DON'T KNOW! YOUR INABILITY TO LISTEN AND UNDERSTAND MEN IS QUITE FOOLISH OF YOU. NOW WATCH THE ENTIRE VIDEO::
LADIES, YOU HAVE DONE THIS TO HIM. WOMAN HAS DONE THIS TO HIM. IT IS YOU THAT MAKES US FIGHT AND DOMINATE TERRITORY AND RESOURCES, NOT FOR OURSELVES BUT FOR YOU! HOW DARE YOU BLAME MEN FOR THE MALE CONDITION!!! HOW DARE YOU SHAME HIM! HOW DARE YOU NOT RESPECT MEN. SHALL WE MEN MAKE A POSTER AND HANG IT ON CAMPUS TO SHAME AND BELITTLE YOU WITH? LET ME MAKE SOMETHING CLEAR, I SAT THROUGH YOUR "WOMEN'S STUDIES COURSE" IN SCHOOL!
This cartoon is what you tried to tell myself and young women about the nature of men. A grossly simplistic and insulting insinuation, a character of a young, obviously progressive young lady rolling her eyes at the animal nature of males. You sold the notion that women are of a higher moral standing than men, that women can save the world if only male social construct of masculinity was eliminated, the male dominated "Patriarchy" of male violence, oppression and tyranny.
YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO TELL ME ABOUT THE NATURE OF MEN. YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIE TO ME ABOUT MY MASCULINITY AND MY MALE NATURE!
You insulted me and talked down about men the entire semester! "The Patriarchy" and males were the source of female oppression and all the worlds problems.... YOU HURT ME AND INSULTED ME FOR AN ENTIRE SEMESTER AND I'M HERE TO DEFEND THE HONOR OF MEN! FEMINISM DOES NOT BELONG IN THE SCIENCE WING OF OUR COLLEGE INSTITUTIONS, IT DOESN'T BELONG ANYWHERE!
I'll tell you what, lets erase all the lines between countries that are all drawn by the blood of men and the stacked bodies of dead boys and let you ladies decide who gets what..I'll tell you what, we can all share, that's a great idea. It would be interesting to see how much you leave for men. Anyway, just make sure you keep us restrained during this process otherwise you're likely to let us do everything for you as you have always done. We may also start brutally competing with each other for these things because it's what gets us mating opportunity with you.
All for what???
WHAT RECIPROCAL BLESSINGS DO YOU BESTOW UPON MEN??? What's that you say, you build and conceive life itself from your body, initiate 70% of all divorce, take this blessing of our beloved child away from us and make us do all of the above for you and support you and "your" child anyway..
What's that you say, you nurture and care for us, how exactly do you do that? Nurturing, caring for and tending to men and your family is considered oppression of women, especially caring for children, that's what day care centers are for. What's that you say, food, nurturing sustenance no no no American Cuisine and family recipes died with your grandmother you should know that..Please, I implore you, what is it that you do for men??? What obligations and responsibilities do you have that you can't walk away from??? You talk so much about how many "choices" women should have. Lets sit down and talk sometime about who has "choices" and who has no choices but responsibilities to support and enable women's "choices" shall we...
Lets compare the exchange of your inherent precious value for male external utility shall we? Let's see who's body is who's choice. Lets see who is oppressing who...SHALL WE...YES WE SHALL LADIES.
Now, let me make something perfectly clear ladies...
Male destructivness is in proportion if not infinitesimal to male constructiveness. If men did mainly harm with our aggression we would be in a world of shit. Men are designed to utilize resources to supportlife. To build and support, provide and protect. This is male aggression at its finest and the side of his aggression that is most predominant. Men are wonderful and beautiful... and we all, especially women should be so grateful for the sacrifices of men, what a blessing strong, masculine, aggressive men are to women and to humanity.
"Traditional male traits such as aggression, competitiveness, risk-taking and stoicism—constrained by virtues of valor, honor and self-sacrifice—are essential to the well-being and safety of our society." -Christina Hoff Sommers- Anti Feminist and Men's Rights Activist
"Masculinity is the most creative cultural force in history. When I cross…any of America’s great bridges, I think—men have done this." -Camille Paglia-
We will just let you join these men below...Yes, this is where it all comes from, ALL OF IT, EVERYTHING you see around you came from male hard labor and 95% of all working deaths. Care to join the pain and suffering or end up one of the 85% of the homeless that are men....ladies...any takers??? How about 80+ percent of all suicides??? Come on, don't be scared but I've got to warn you it's a lonely place where no one cares for your welfare anymore. A FEDERAL OFFICE ON MEN'S HEALTH no no no those are for you my dear, you have 7 or more now as I recall. Is there any more male health we can sacrifice for you??? Look at the very very bottom, where you will find the majority of medical afflictions, deformations, retardation, learning disabled, poor and ill health, early death etc. Come on join the club of "male privilege". Ever look below the "glass floor" ladies?? It's a dark, desolate, lonely place that rarely a woman falls through.
AND FINALLY, men do what we do and our nature is what it is because you made it that way. Men have been selected for and breed by you to become EXACTLY what you needed us to be. It is YOU who places such value on male external utility. It is you who demands and makes us produce for you. You are the source of your own dependence. Men dominate what you demand we dominate. When women, will you truly be independent as this is the day you will not need us anymore. PLEASE STOP needing us for anything. STOP belittling men for your dependency.
When will you liberate men from our servitude to you that you call oppression...When? When will you stop competing with men for the vary things you demand from us? When will you stop enacting public policies to handicap us from doing so?
Women you can STOP laying around on your lazy asses while men do all the heavy lifting of providing and protecting, acquiring, building, fixing, maintaining and utilizing resources to support life. You can stop complaining, be "strong and independent" ladies AND LEAVE MEN ALONE! You can do so especially after you divorce us, take our property, our children and force us to financially support you and "your" child. You are the most privileged class of human being, along side children. Now, close your mouths and show some respect and reciprocal obligation.....
Are duty, honor, self sacrifice and commitment only something men do? Is it not your turn to get down on your knees in front of the feet of men and offer us gold and diamond rings you mined from the Earth??? Woman, it's your turn to drown yourselves in the cold icy waters of unyielding dedication to the welfare of men. I'm challenging your vaillantry (valor) woman. Hath not woman (valor) vaillantry? Will you not sacrifice for our welfare as we have done for you???
Is there a nurturing, compassionate ounce of dedication and servitude to men left in you?? I don't even need to express to you the legions of men who publicly advocate for your welfare and the men who do so quietly in their private lives SOMETIMES BY FORCE OF THE LAW. Little have I witnessed the same from women. Does your sense of victimhood and entitlement really run that deep? Yes, given your separatist, competitive, secular, political disposition and gynocentric focus on your own welfare it certainly does...
GIVE MEN AND FATHERS OUR EQUAL RIGHTS!
Give men the dignity and respect we deserve. Honor men and our place in society and in the family or simply stay far away from men as we want nothing to do with you otherwise. You should know that by the demands women place on us we do our best to bear our burdens in silence, taking it like men, getting tough or dying, sucking it up, manning up etc. We do so because it makes our external utility a slightly bit higher than the next man....Do you know why?
I can assure you of one thing, when men start complaining that we are in pain you had better listen as the breaking point is near and in many cases has already passed and in some cases this passing of energy can be extremely violent, somewhat akin to a supernova, a self termination if you're lucky and something else if you are not. Increasingly I fear it will be a combination of both.
SHALL I INFORM YOU THAT YOU HAVE DONE THIS TO US, that you are the cause of our pain???..SHALL I MAKE A POSTER??? YET YOU NEGLECT TO REALIZE THIS and tend nothing to him...TELL US WOMAN, HOW SHALL MAN SERVE YOU MORE? YOUR SERVITUDE AND EMPATHY FOR THE WELFARE OF MEN IS OPPRESSION YOU SAY?
"The personal is political" you say? INDEED, it now is and as a result THE MALE GENDER NEEDS TO ORGANIZE AS A SOCIO-POLITICAL CLASS WITH REPRESENTATION AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL as women now do to stem the tide you have turned. You have made "the personal political" as you set out to do 40 years ago, 0 hour, D-DAY, the beginning of "SECOND WAVE" FEMINISM.
How long are men going to allow this type of thing without responding or reacting? How long do posters like this have to stay hanging in young men's faces before they tear them down and burn them? When will men have representation and a voice within our universities! For god sake, when are men going to start defending our honor? SHALL WE MAKE BLANKET accusational posters toward women? When are men going to form ranks and fight back? When will we formulate a response? When will we demand to enter the intellectual discourse that now pervades universities? When will we confront the feminist hegemony?
Do feminists fear their ideology is not compatible to even so much as a dialectical relationship? Dialectical Totality suggests that contradictions in a relationship are part of a unified whole and cannot be understood in isolation. We shall find out soon enough..Open intellectual discourse is on the horizon..Men will no longer have to fear losing their jobs when we speak openly in academia!....The time has come and MALE STUDIES NOT FEMINIST "MEN'S STUDIES" IS ON THE HORIZON AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO STOP IT!
Men are beginning to fight to restore our sacred bond with you, a bond that has been sullied, desecrated, demeaned, profited off of, humiliated and exploited. You have made chivalry toward women a for profit industry and done incredible harm to men, boys, husbands, fathers and the family itself in the process. Woman it is you and your beliefs. Woman it is your actions, your Women's Feminist leaders who are killing something within men. You seek to kill a sense of respect, duty and honor toward women and family, the chivalry you are killing in him, the father and husband in him.
I ask you what is woman to men if she is not honorable? What is woman if her station and social identity is not wife and mother? What is woman when she becomes men's liability and responsibility without reciprocal obligation, duty and commitment? What is she when she is our competition socially, politically and economically? Beware your Feminist Leaders Women, watch closely what they are doing. YOU WILL DO THIS NO MORE!.............
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
My Body Her Choice……Her Body Her Choice…..A Child’s Body Her Choice
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010
By Rebuking Feminism [source]
I think it would be wise to take a closer look at some of the central tenets involved in the battle of the sexes. I read a comment at The-Spearhead.com the other day which got me thinking. I'd like to borrow where the author left off and expound upon the inseparability of the general female ethos and feminism itself.
First and foremost I've come to the conclusion that all women are feminists.
What differs is the minute nuances in the general philosophy of liberal women (feminists) and conservative women (feminists).
Both in fact demand chivalry, but in different ways. Left women or left feminists want socialist chivalry, in which men and government in aggregate support or defer to women, ( take the "women first" laws in college admissions and business hiring or diversion of the Stimulus Package to women for instance). Liberal women don't want marriage or family to be necessary for women whereas “conservative” women favor enfranchising the individual man (i.e. husband) bearing the burden. The conservative woman wants to garner the fruits of an individual man's labor and liberal feminists want to garner the fruits of mens and societies communal labor.
In the current situation, we have a mix of both, but there is still a fight between these women over men's resources, as some of the working married man’s money and indeed women's own money goes to support single mother feminist types through the tax base, but perhaps not as much as left feminists would like.
The conservative feminists are for less socialized support but empowerment to transfer men's money to women directly under the theory that men over all produce more and have more incentive to produce under this "male employability" as part of the family model. However, both are agreed that the fruits of male labor produced by his body should be transferable to women outside of marriage after divorce and both are in agreement that females should be given primary ownership of children.
Neither left women nor conservative women favor easing men’s burdens, at least in regard to the private sphere but there is a fundamental philosophical difference concerning how best to extract male and societal resources in general to support women and "their" children. For men, neither system is favorable as both lead to male disenfranchisement and loss of bodily sovereignty, furthermore we will simply be and indeed are currently paying more to support women either way, both in the private sphere and public sphere in the general increase in "women first" policies and socialized support for women and "their" children.
So to me the illusion of female independence from dependency is simple, through manipulation of divorce law and social policy women are no more independent than they ever were. What has changed is the ways or "choices" afforded them as to how to extract this support, consequently and unfortunately at this point it is by both methods, both private transferability of male labor outside the bounds of marriage and public transferability of aggregate societal male labor and at the collective male expense.
In terms of male agency or shall I say lack thereof in the family as is current, the two female strategies work together in concert for male expendability by provider "resource transferability" or what I like to call an "isolated resource producing male" and of course the accompanied surrendering of fatherhood. This much is agreed upon by women and both see this as "liberation" and "independence" for women. What is not agreed however is how to best harvest male production output while at the same time maintaining female "freedom of choice" and autonomy, A fluid support structure for matriarchal (female and child centered social structure) polyandry or polyamory if you will.
One could actually surmise that women are infact married to the State, this is their real husband. This "Government Husbandry" is essential to maintaining the male expendability and "forced labor resource transferability" paradigm. It is essential to maintaining female "choices".
A woman can have as many husbands and families as the natural order of sexual selection by males will allow. She is given full control, agency and return on investment for her production value and the fruits of her bodily labor (her inherent value in mate selection terms). In fact the system is designed so that a female not only retains "ownership" of children but all of these offspring from different males are all supported by "isolated resource producing males" and by what is increasingly so "government husbandry".
Where as men can only have as many families or wives or offspring as they can financially afford because sovereignty over his body and the fruits of labor produced by it are transferable to women.
The key for women is to maintain as much and more control over sex, reproduction and most importantly conception but more importantly the property rights she has managed to associate with her bodily labor and the fruits bared by her labor.
The dichotomy goes to illustrate inherent, internal and soveriegn female production value as opposed to male production value which is is heavily weighted in "external utility", which is variable, external and thus exploitable and transferable.
The goals of both men and women are to maintain control over our own bodies and the fruits of our labor. THIS IS THE KEY POINT OF BATTLE.
The goal of women is to have control over both her own body, the body of a child prior to, during and after conception and the body of men by dominating and controlling in entirety female productive value and through doing so establish control over the productive value of men.
This is why abortion rights are the keystone to feminist rule. It is not about a woman's body or a woman's health, it is in fact about control of property. From the seemingly innocuous saying "my body my choice" comes "my baby my choice" which yields her the right of "a man's body my choice"
The idea is bodily sovereignty, property and ownership
The primary goal of feminism and the struggle for so called "equality" extends from this central issue i.e. control over property.
In other words feminism is about female control of:
-her body which leads to the end goal of control over
-the body of the child (both during and after conception) both in marriage and divorce
-and the body of a man through the fruits of his labor both in marriage and after divorce. If she can gain and maintain control over the first two she does in fact have full control over the bodily sovereignty of ALL HUMAN LIFE.
It is precisely the male value in external utility that women are able to exploit by law to support themselves and "their" children both in private family law policy and publicly through social policy to "empower" and "liberate" women, to give them "independence". It is in fact the lack of control men have over their own bodies that leads to male oppression. It is in fact the lack of control men have over their own bodies that leads to male expendability i.e. the end goal of female liberation and independence.
We ARE IN FACT the only sex which is required to yield our body over to the service of the other sex both in our private lives and publicly. We are the only sex who's bodily sovereignty is transferable to the other outside of marriage after divorce.
Men's bodies are for the service of women and country. Men have no bodily sovereignty in our private lives or public. In both realms the male body is expendable and the fruits of its labor transferable, it is fully put to use and socialized. You, a man can not gain so much as a drivers license if you have not registered your body to be drafted to military service. You, a man can not get legally married unless you agree to the marriage registration which entails the drafting of use for your body and the fruits of its labor by women outside of marriage. The goal is to create female "choices" facilitated by male liabilities.
However I must add that no matter how necessary our war with women has become, this war is deeply harmful. I feel viscerally that this is an unnatural fight. Under the natural order of things we are supposed to be mutually dependent on the other. I believe we are actually supposed to be mutually bonded, not in diametric opposition for control over our bodies and the body of the other sex and the fruits of its labor but in fact to give and yield to the other in entirety. We are in fact supposed to need each other. This however, is not the case by law nor is it the disposition of women to have such equality as many men have figured out. The personal has become the political and so we as men must fight women who are now our competition politically, socially and economically.
We to must fight for our true independence from women's dependency, not as they have fought for independence from dependency on men i.e. (through exploitation, ownership and transferability of male bodily sovereignty and male agency.) The only other suggestion I can think of is to enact shared custody of children, thereby eliminating child support and eliminate alimony as women are supposed to be working to support themselves and their families. The "choice" of women to "work or stay home" should no longer be something men pay for as a future capitalized liability of alimony and furthermore through such liability loss of the right to an active and meaningful role in the lives of our children. Women must have responsibilities that are not by law made to be liabilities to men.
To me it is obvious that the central tenet of war between the sexes entails bodily sovereignty and ownership of ones own body but most importantly the body of others, of which, at this point anyway women have complete rule, possession and authority over the bodily sovereignty of us all.
This dichotomy forms the basis for the paradigm in which women claim to be "sex objects". It is this same dichotomy that makes men "resource objects" "success objects" "external utility objects" But I ask you, who has more control over the bodily sovereignty of the other? Who has control over such by law?
I ask you all to contemplate for a moment who has more control, ownership, rights, individual sovereignty and liberty over their bodies and the fruit bared by its labors???
Which sex has more control, ownership, rights, sovereignty and liberty over the body of the other and that of children as well?
Answer these basic questions for yourself and I think we will be well on our way to understanding the rights of men and women as we relate to what is supposed to be but IS NO LONGER (yet what I believe should be) an ENTIRELY CONSUMMATE RECIPROCAL MARRIED BOND,A FAMILY.
Topics: Rebuking Feminism | View Comments
« Previous Entries Next Entries »