Anatomy of Matriarchy & Gynocentric Consummation

By Rebuking Feminism | Source | April 25, 2010

J-D said: “We still need a coherent message on traditional masculinity and it’s place in the MRA movement.

Absolutely!

–”Traditional masculinity (specifically the protective male instinct) is the reason for the rise of female supremacy”

Absolutely,..and precisely because females are now able to and indeed seek to legislate and personify the male within government. I believe instinctually males tend to avoid competition and conflict with females and are actually quite responsive to female demands, screams and otherwise female demands or perceived need for more protection and provision. I do believe that males are predisposed to look after female general safety and well being. As you have noticed deference to females has become legislated by law. This is inevitably what happens to the political and social system when females are given power over it. They actually commandeer the social fabric and legislative policies to serve their own ends. Female authority and power is not protective or provisionary to males as male power and authority is to females.

It is no mistake that the Stimulus Package was devoted to females upon the request of Women's Party Feminists for protection and provision though 80% of all jobs lost have been to men.

Essentially and unfortunately our essential natures are personified within the political system and further reinforced by the dominate female 54-56% majority vote.
Through this model provision to females becomes dually compounded. The system essentially becomes matrifocal, gynocentric and Matriarchal.

Males will actually turn on other males and the well being of males as a group to accommodate the needs of females. I believe this is why females as a group vote overwhelmingly for male candidates. The system very quickly becomes matrifocal and begins to cannibalize itself of male enfranchisement. Political leaders are rewarded with power for serving the dominate female voting block.

See: Workhorses of the Matriarchy


"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years." -Alexander Tytler (attributed)

Our Founding Fathers hated Democracy! They referred to it as the "tyranny of the majority" They believed, they hoped that the foundational laws of our Republic could save us.

This is why Matriarchal civilizations do not and can not progress beyond the communal level. In larger social constructs the system actually cannibalizes itself of it's own means of production and the associated enfranchisement and productive incentive of males. Females actually seek to create and personify the male within government,a government husband if you will.

In terms of mate selection males are a class divided especially in relation to the government husband. When these forces are acted upon and introduced systemically and politically the results can be and have been disastrous for males. Call it chivalry turned against itself, chivalry institutionalized and legislated, the best aspects of males used against us as a group by the government and reinforced by the female voting block. This is in fact the greatest weapon of feminism.

Female authority is not protective or provisional like male authority is. When female gynocentrism becomes systemic as it has, civilizational decline quickly follows, historically it always has. I am not so sure our Republic can recover from this…. But we have the duty to understand what is happening in the hopes of correcting it….

Female power, being gynocentric in nature advocates for the consummation of resources around the well being of females and females alone. Women as a political group will not stop this, it is simply female nature. Systemically speaking female authority and power consumes the system of itself.



”The idea of men gathering in groups to discuss their problems as a gender flies directly in the face of traditional masculinity.”

Absolutely, Males will not do this as we are in competition to distinguish our own value in external utility from other males. We will not advocate to help other males UNLESS we realize what I'm trying to outline here which is that MALES AS A GROUP are being systematically and politically disenfranchised. UNLESS, males are able to respond to this and organize as a group for our own wellbeing and enfranchisement the Matriarchal system will continue to grow.

Unless this is achieved it will be business as usual i.e. males particularly those in power will actually turn on other males to accommodate the needs of females especially when females have the dominate power in the political system. Again, the system turns matrifocal very quickly. The males who serve the needs of females the most are voted into power. In terms of mate selection males are a class divided. In terms of the well being of males Vs institutionalized Government Husbandry \ Chivalry \ Matriarchy we can not compete. The goal essentially is to nullify the necessity of husband and father all together both at the personal level in family and divorce law and at the political level with Federal law.

This agenda is in fact what women meant when they said “The Personal Is Political”

The idea is to systematically direct the resource support construct ordinarily provided through marriage to themselves through the political process, from family law to the Federal level. This is done by two primary methods, forced resource provision by Isolated Resource Producing Males after no-fault divorce at the family level and through Government Husbandry.

In terms of political power males can not compete with the homogeneous and gynocentric tendencies of female nature and the related political disposition of it's voting block. Again, we must remember that females are programed to look after themselves while males are a means to an end for herself and “her” offspring. When you observe the social systems that females build, when you observe their behavior within these institutions this becomes very clear.

The female carries inherent value and does not seek to be worthy of the well being of males, she is in fact inherently worthy. In essence, her biological value can not become systemic, institutionalized transferable and stolen from her in the political process or even to the level of family law as she can do to males. Male value after all is heavily weighted in "external utility"

Male enfranchisement and voting participation has been on the decline ever since….

This is the natural result of Matriarchy and female institutional power. Male voting rates have declined sharply since mid-1960s i.e. the beginning of the Matriarchal social and political construct (feminism). Between the 1964 and 2000 Presidential elections the male voting rate declined from 72 to 53 percent.

All male fitness and well being indicators are in a drastic decline.

GRAPHS: MALE HEALTH INDICATORS

-workforce participation

-voter participation

-suicide rates

-incarceration rates

-college attendance, educational attainment and admittance policy
-educational attainment graph #2

-marriage rates

-divorce rates annotated* for cohabitation

-general health & health care & life expectancy

If history is any lesson, I do not think it will be much longer before a patriarchal civilization finishes us off….. this is the way it has always been….

Of further note it is important to recognize that Matriarchy goes hand in hand with polyandry. Females are just as adamant in regard to increasing their genetic fitness and diversity, she will in fact move from male to male if the resource support construct is available. This is what women have sought and accomplished in their changes to family and marriage law and increasingly are doing so with their representation at the Federal level. Such is the central course of action female political and social power has taken and will continue to take. Such is the course of the female biological imperative and thus its representative political ethos. It is the end goal and central modus operandi of feminism. Such propensities are increasingly enforced through such organizations as N.O.W., The Feminist Majority and other large feminist organizations. This is done so increasingly through the Federal Council On Women and Girls as well.

Note*

Though all aspects of male health and well being are in decline there is no Council On Men and Boys nor a Federal Office On Men's Health while women now have 7 the last time I checked. Though it is thought since it is males who are our public servants that males are adequately represented as a socio-political class but this is not the case for the reasons I've outlined above. Quite frankly our founders never intended to have separate and unequal representation and laws within government by gender, race or religion.

The solution would be to remove representation by gender within government altogether or add representation for the male gender. The end goal should be to somehow restore rights, advocacy, representation and enfranchisement of men, boys, husbands and fathers in society, family, divorce law and in governmental policy.

The above blog post was inspired by conversations had at The-Spearhead.Com and Mensnewsdaily.Com