About Us

Misandry Review is a forum for talented bloggers who write from a pro-male perspective. Our content spans a variety of viewpoints, including MRA, MGTOW, conservative and libertarian (more info). To request inclusion into the system, please contact John Dias.

Videos About Misandry

Add to my Web site
Loading...

Comments Invited!

To post a comment on any article, just click on the article's title, scroll down to the bottom of the page, and begin typing in the space provided. You may also register for a comments account, which will make commenting even easier. We look forward to reading your opinions!

Books We Recommend

Search

Recent Posts


« | Main | »

RESEARCH SHOWING WOMEN THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE ARRESTED IS CHALLENGEABLE

By The Rights of Man | Source | November 10, 2009

In September, the media reported research which allegedly showed that female perpetrators were three times as likely to be arrested than male perpetrators. This certainly seems odd as one of the many complaints is that the police arrest the man when there is a dispute over culpability as that is the easier option.

The research Who Does What To Whom from Professor Marianne Hester was certainly worth interrogating to see if this possibly could be true especially as it had received media attention and seemed to go against the grain. Of course, Bristol University's PR team wanted to create the most waves (press release).

Three things strike you as you read the report.

Firstly, that women are more likely to be used by a woman than a man (the Guardian spin this as self-defence). The figure is 24% to 11%.

Secondly, whilst the research is meant to compare 32 male and 32 female perpetrators, there is no discussion on the actual severity of the crimes. For an arrest the police would make an independent judgement and if an arrest needed to be made they would make it. However, there is no real indication on the severity of the crime to make a statement that women were more likely to be arrested for the same crime which would then prove some bias.

The last point and it is one made eloquently by Ally Fogg on The Guardian's Comment is Free site. Obviously he is well versed in police procedure as he makes the point that even when no arrests are made, the police still have to record a primary aggressor on their 'visit' sheet. There would be 'no questions asked' it is easier for the police officer to just put down the man. It means that Hester's figures may be distorted because of this as it would look like a man is less likely to be arrested than a woman, but that is based on the figures where the police will by default put the man down as a primary aggressor where no arrest has been made.

Again with all this and similarly with the gender pay gap issues, like for like issues have to be compared. Looking at the figures and not what lies beneath them leads to people with agendas being able to spin what they like. It is simply not credible to say that men are three time sless likely to be arrested for a DV crime than a woman.

Topics: The Rights of Man | View Comments

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

blog comments powered by Disqus